TERG vs. FNGU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TERG is actively managed, while FNGU is passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TERG charges 0.75%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

TERG vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TERG achieves a 229.64% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 36.18% return.

TERG

• 1D: 8.49%
• 1M: 39.95%
• YTD: 229.64%
• 6M: 218.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGU

• 1D: -3.75%
• 1M: 33.96%
• YTD: 36.18%
• 6M: 16.22%
• 1Y: 64.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TERG vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF	229.64%	28.17%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	36.18%	-10.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TERG and FNGU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

TERG vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 27
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TERG vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TERG	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	9.90	0.40	+9.50

Drawdowns

TERG vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TERG drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TERG and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TERG	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.52%	-60.84%	+11.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-59.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.98%	-4.84%	-11.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.73%	-22.06%	+8.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	24.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TERG	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	44.77%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	139.25%	57.50%	+81.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	139.25%	78.60%	+60.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	139.25%	78.60%	+60.65%

TERG vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TERG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TERG vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither TERG nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TERG and FNGU in my portfolio?

TERG and FNGU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TERG or FNGU?

On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TERG or FNGU?

TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TERG or FNGU?

TERG and FNGU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TERG and FNGU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TERG and 2.60% for FNGU.