PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TER vs. COCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TER vs. COCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 90.11% return, which is significantly higher than COCO's 24.39% return.


TER

1D
0.60%
1M
-13.96%
6M
52.66%
YTD
90.11%
1Y
243.14%
3Y*
49.54%
5Y*
24.17%
10Y*
34.90%
ALL TIME*
11.43%

COCO

1D
-1.51%
1M
-4.41%
6M
23.60%
YTD
24.39%
1Y
87.01%
3Y*
35.70%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$95.25M$85.05M$87.09M
$1.53B$1.39B$1.68B

TER vs. COCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
90.11%54.39%16.51%24.78%-46.35%39.92%
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
24.39%43.62%43.90%85.60%23.72%-27.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TER and COCO is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TER:

$57.56B

COCO:

$3.77B

EPS

TER:

$7.28

COCO:

$1.82

PE Ratio

TER:

50.51

COCO:

36.31

PS Ratio

TER:

13.02

COCO:

5.63

PB Ratio

TER:

0.02

COCO:

9.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

TER:

$4.46B

COCO:

$706.02M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TER:

$2.65B

COCO:

$289.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

TER:

$1.42B

COCO:

$143.38M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TER vs. COCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TER
TER Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
TER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TER Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TER Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TER Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TER Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

COCO
COCO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
COCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
COCO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
COCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TER vs. COCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TERCOCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.20

3.77

+3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.29

9.72

+12.57

TER vs. COCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TER Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is higher than the COCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TER and COCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TER vs. COCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than COCO's maximum drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and COCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TERCOCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.30%

-56.97%

-40.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.98%

-23.23%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.18%

-38.55%

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.01%

-21.52%

-2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.54%

-16.70%

-41.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.96%

9.02%

+1.94%

Volatility

TER vs. COCO - Volatility Comparison

Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 29.42% compared to The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) at 14.30%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TERCOCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.42%

14.30%

+15.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.50%

45.30%

+18.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.88%

55.50%

+18.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.71%

56.79%

-4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.68%

56.79%

-10.11%

Dividends

TER vs. COCO - Dividend Comparison

TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while COCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
0.14%0.25%0.38%0.41%0.50%0.24%0.33%0.53%1.15%0.67%0.94%1.16%

Financials

TER vs. COCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and The Vita Coco Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

TER vs. COCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Teradyne, Inc. and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

TER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 794.62M and revenue of 1.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.8%.

COCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 105.31M and revenue of 216.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

TER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 437.81M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.9%.

COCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 63.14M and revenue of 216.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.2%.

TER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 374.53M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.

COCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 49.45M and revenue of 216.15M, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TER and COCO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TER has higher volatility (29.42%) compared to COCO (14.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TER dropped -97.30% vs COCO's -56.97%.

TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TER and COCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer