PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TENM vs. QB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TENM vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TENM achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 10.47% return.


TENM

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QB

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.95%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TENM vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TENM and QB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TENM vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TENM vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TENMQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

3.17

-0.99

Drawdowns

TENM vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TENM drawdown since its inception was -3.61%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TENM and QB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TENMQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-1.83%

-1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.30%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-0.34%

-0.36%

Volatility

TENM vs. QB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TENMQBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.52%

5.75%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.52%

5.75%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.52%

5.75%

+0.77%

TENM vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TENM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

TENM vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

TENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than QB's 0.62% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TENM and QB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TENM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TENM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QB.

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.28% for TENM.

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TENM and 0.58% for QB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TENM and QB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer