PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TENM vs. JULB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TENM vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TENM having a 6.19% return and JULB slightly higher at 6.35%.


TENM

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JULB

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.40%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TENM vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TENM and JULB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TENM vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TENM vs. JULB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TENMJULBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

2.17

0.00

Drawdowns

TENM vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TENM drawdown since its inception was -3.61%, smaller than the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TENM and JULB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TENMJULBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-5.24%

+1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.07%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-0.87%

+0.17%

Volatility

TENM vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TENMJULBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.52%

6.81%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.52%

6.81%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.52%

6.81%

-0.29%

TENM vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TENM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TENM vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

TENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
JULB
Aptus July Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%
TENM
iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF
0.28%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TENM and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TENM.

TENM has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TENM and 0.25% for JULB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TENM and JULB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer