TENM vs. PQAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TENM (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

TENM vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TENM achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.

TENM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 6.19%
• 6M: 6.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TENM vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TENM iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF	6.19%	2.04%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	12.09%	2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TENM and PQAP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

TENM vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TENM vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TENM	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.17	1.76	+0.41

Drawdowns

TENM vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TENM drawdown since its inception was -3.61%, smaller than the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TENM and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TENM	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-10.79%	+7.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.12%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-0.60%	-0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TENM	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.52%	4.45%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.52%	11.03%	-4.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.52%	11.03%	-4.51%

TENM vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TENM and PQAP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

TENM vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

TENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, more than PQAP's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%
TENM iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF	0.28%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TENM and PQAP in my portfolio?

TENM and PQAP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TENM or PQAP?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TENM or PQAP?

TENM and PQAP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TENM or PQAP?

TENM has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.02% for PQAP.

What is the main difference between TENM and PQAP?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and PGIM.