TENM vs. BLCR
TENM (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TENM is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BLCR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TENM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.
Performance
TENM vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TENM achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 15.00% return.
TENM
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BLCR
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.05M | $18.88M | $32.16M | |
| $66.59K | $72.96K | $117.43K |
TENM vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TENM iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF | 7.27% | 2.04% |
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 15.00% | 5.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TENM and BLCR is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TENM vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank
TENM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLCR
TENM vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TENM | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TENM vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TENM drawdown since its inception was -3.61%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TENM and BLCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TENM | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -21.29% | +17.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.18% | +4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -2.24% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.56% | — |
Volatility
TENM vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TENM | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.52% | 17.19% | -10.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.52% | 17.71% | -11.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.52% | 17.71% | -11.19% |
TENM vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TENM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
TENM vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison
TENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than BLCR's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.75% | 0.13% |
TENM iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF | 0.27% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TENM and BLCR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TENM.
BLCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.27% for TENM.
TENM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BLCR is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TENM and 0.36% for BLCR.
Find the right allocation for TENM and BLCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer