TEMWX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Templeton World Fund (TEMWX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
TEMWX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 16, 1978. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
TEMWX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEMWX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMWX Templeton World Fund | -6.75% | 21.42% | 20.34% | 32.29% | -22.91% | 8.04% | 3.59% | 12.03% | -12.02% | 12.74% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEMWX achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, TEMWX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 6.91%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.78% annualized return.
TEMWX
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 6M
- -4.24%
- 1Y
- 13.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.91%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEMWX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMWX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEMWX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
TEMWX
FGIAX
TEMWX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton World Fund (TEMWX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEMWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.79 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 2.30 | -1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.36 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 2.73 | -1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 12.62 | -8.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEMWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.79 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.80 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.58 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.42 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMWX and FGIAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TEMWX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
TEMWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.31%, more than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMWX Templeton World Fund | 14.31% | 13.34% | 8.52% | 0.63% | 1.60% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 1.15% | 21.11% | 5.83% | 2.77% | 5.66% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
TEMWX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMWX drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMWX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.26% | -49.35% | -5.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.86% | -8.29% | -5.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -21.08% | -10.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.97% | -38.02% | +6.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.01% | -3.06% | -7.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -7.22% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 1.79% | +1.74% |
Volatility
TEMWX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Templeton World Fund (TEMWX) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that TEMWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEMWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 4.15% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 7.07% | +5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 12.28% | +5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 13.08% | +5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 15.17% | +1.65% |