TEMWX vs. FKGRX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TEMWX (Templeton World Fund) and FKGRX (Franklin Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - TEMWX is a Global Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, TEMWX returned 8.31%/yr vs 14.09%/yr for FKGRX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEMWX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FKGRX.

Performance

TEMWX vs. FKGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton World Fund (TEMWX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEMWX achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly higher than FKGRX's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, TEMWX has underperformed FKGRX with an annualized return of 8.31%, while FKGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.

TEMWX

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 3.88%
• 6M: 3.48%
• 1Y: 16.92%
• 3Y*: 19.34%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: 8.31%

FKGRX

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -2.05%
• YTD: 3.19%
• 6M: 2.00%
• 1Y: 13.64%
• 3Y*: 15.65%
• 5Y*: 8.02%
• 10Y*: 14.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMWX vs. FKGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TEMWX Templeton World Fund	3.88%	21.42%	20.34%	32.29%	-22.91%	8.04%	3.59%	12.03%	-12.02%	12.74%
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund	3.19%	15.38%	17.96%	27.54%	-25.32%	21.61%	30.71%	32.08%	-3.37%	26.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMWX and FKGRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990	0.75

The correlation between TEMWX and FKGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TEMWX vs. FKGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMWX

TEMWX Risk / Return Rank: 21
TEMWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TEMWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
TEMWX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
TEMWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TEMWX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

FKGRX

FKGRX Risk / Return Rank: 19
FKGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FKGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FKGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FKGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FKGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMWX vs. FKGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton World Fund (TEMWX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEMWX	FKGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.11	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	1.59	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.20	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	1.32	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.38	5.29	+0.09

TEMWX vs. FKGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEMWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the FKGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEMWX and FKGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TEMWX vs. FKGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMWX drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than FKGRX's maximum drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMWX and FKGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEMWX	FKGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.26%	-51.08%	-4.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.86%	-11.48%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.70%	-21.72%	+5.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.86%	-32.22%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.97%	-32.52%	+0.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.75%	-3.92%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.81%	-6.73%	-2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	2.86%	+0.65%

Volatility

TEMWX vs. FKGRX - Volatility Comparison

Templeton World Fund (TEMWX) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) at 5.11%. This indicates that TEMWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEMWX	FKGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.58%	5.11%	+2.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.48%	10.89%	+3.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.96%	13.64%	+3.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.73%	19.68%	-0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.80%	19.55%	-2.75%

TEMWX vs. FKGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMWX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FKGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEMWX vs. FKGRX - Dividend Comparison

TEMWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.84%, less than FKGRX's 13.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund	13.93%	14.37%	8.34%	6.26%	10.49%	9.19%	7.97%	5.75%	1.65%	2.38%	3.26%	3.88%
TEMWX Templeton World Fund	12.84%	13.34%	8.52%	0.63%	1.60%	1.53%	0.00%	1.15%	21.11%	5.83%	2.77%	5.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEMWX and FKGRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, TEMWX and FKGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TEMWX or FKGRX?

TEMWX has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to FKGRX (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMWX dropped -55.26% vs FKGRX's -51.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TEMWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.