TEMR vs. FLXR
TEMR (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF) and FLXR (TCW Flexible Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while FLXR is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
TEMR vs. FLXR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TEMR
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FLXR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.36M | $16.28M | $17.08M | |
| $55.08K | $37.97K | $35.36K |
TEMR vs. FLXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF | 4.99% |
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMR and FLXR is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEMR vs. FLXR — Risk / Return Rank
TEMR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLXR
TEMR vs. FLXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEMR | FLXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEMR vs. FLXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMR drawdown since its inception was -14.32%, which is greater than FLXR's maximum drawdown of -1.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMR and FLXR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMR | FLXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.32% | -1.94% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.32% | -0.43% | -13.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -0.35% | -3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility
TEMR vs. FLXR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEMR | FLXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.01% | 2.35% | +30.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 2.79% | +30.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 2.79% | +30.22% |
TEMR vs. FLXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TEMR and FLXR have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
TEMR vs. FLXR - Dividend Comparison
TEMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF | 5.91% | 5.66% | 3.44% |
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEMR and FLXR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TEMR and FLXR have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
FLXR has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.00% for TEMR.
TEMR is categorized as Actively Managed, while FLXR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and TCW.
Find the right allocation for TEMR and FLXR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer