PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXR vs. BINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXR vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXR achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than BINC's 1.23% return.


FLXR

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.40%
1Y
5.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BINC

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.63%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.46%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXR vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
1.15%8.37%4.42%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
1.23%7.57%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXR and BINC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024

0.70

The correlation between FLXR and BINC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXR vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXR
FLXR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FLXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXR vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLXRBINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.49

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

2.11

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.92

8.22

+7.70

FLXR vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXR Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXR and BINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLXR vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXR drawdown since its inception was -1.94%, smaller than the maximum BINC drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXR and BINC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXRBINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-2.69%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-2.69%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.16%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-0.36%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.69%

-0.35%

Volatility

FLXR vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) has a higher volatility of 0.80% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.60%. This indicates that FLXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXRBINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

0.60%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

1.88%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32%

2.30%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.81%

2.99%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.81%

2.99%

-0.18%

FLXR vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLXR and BINC have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

FLXR vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

FLXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, which matches BINC's 5.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
5.85%5.86%6.14%3.13%
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
5.81%5.66%3.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXR and BINC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLXR has higher volatility (0.80%) compared to BINC (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLXR dropped -1.94% vs BINC's -2.69%.

On 1-year performance, BINC leads with 5.64% vs 5.45% for FLXR. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BINC has performed better with a 5.64% return vs 5.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLXR and BINC have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

BINC has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 5.81% for FLXR.

They also come from different issuers: TCW and iShares.

BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXR and BINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer