PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXR vs. FALN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLXR vs. FALN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLXR vs. FALN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
0.20%8.37%4.77%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
-0.49%8.92%4.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXR achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly higher than FALN's -0.49% return.


FLXR

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
0.20%
6M
1.42%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FALN

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.31%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLXR vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLXR vs. FALN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXR
FLXR Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FALN
FALN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXR vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXRFALNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

0.98

+1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

1.40

+1.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.23

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

1.25

+2.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.53

5.37

+10.16

FLXR vs. FALN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXR Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the FALN Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXR and FALN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXRFALNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

0.98

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.69

0.72

+1.97

Correlation

The correlation between FLXR and FALN is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLXR vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison

FLXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, less than FALN's 6.51% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
5.68%5.66%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
6.51%6.31%6.24%5.37%5.08%3.40%5.14%5.35%5.97%6.98%3.55%

Drawdowns

FLXR vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXR drawdown since its inception was -1.94%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXR and FALN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXRFALNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-29.22%

+27.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-5.57%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-2.28%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-3.37%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

1.29%

-0.90%

Volatility

FLXR vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) is 1.04%, while iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that FLXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLXRFALNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

2.82%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

3.57%

-1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55%

6.92%

-4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.83%

7.28%

-4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.83%

9.01%

-6.18%