PortfoliosLab logo
FLXR vs. FALN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLXR and FALN is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLXR vs. FALN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FLXR:

3.28%

FALN:

6.89%

Max Drawdown

FLXR:

-1.94%

FALN:

-29.22%

Current Drawdown

FLXR:

0.00%

FALN:

-0.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXR achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly higher than FALN's 1.64% return.


FLXR

YTD

3.39%

1M

0.46%

6M

3.17%

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FALN

YTD

1.64%

1M

1.05%

6M

0.79%

1Y

7.78%

3Y*

5.91%

5Y*

5.89%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TCW Flexible Income ETF

FLXR vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLXR vs. FALN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXR

FALN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FALN is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FALN is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FALN is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FALN is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FALN is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FALN is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLXR vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FLXR vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison

FLXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than FALN's 6.33% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
5.44%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
6.33%6.24%5.37%5.08%3.40%5.14%5.35%5.97%6.98%3.55%

Drawdowns

FLXR vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXR drawdown since its inception was -1.94%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXR and FALN.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FLXR vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...