TEMD vs. BLST

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

TEMD (Templeton Emerging Markets Debt ETF) and BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMD is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton Investments, while BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Bluemonte. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEMD charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLST.

Performance

TEMD vs. BLST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Emerging Markets Debt ETF (TEMD) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TEMD

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.76%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLST

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 1Y: 3.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMD vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TEMD Templeton Emerging Markets Debt ETF	2.45%
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMD and BLST is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	0.67

Return for Risk

TEMD vs. BLST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLST

BLST Risk / Return Rank: 52
BLST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
BLST Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BLST Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BLST Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BLST Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMD vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Emerging Markets Debt ETF (TEMD) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEMD	BLST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.49	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.98	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.96	—

Drawdowns

TEMD vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMD drawdown since its inception was -4.34%, which is greater than BLST's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMD and BLST.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEMD	BLST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.34%	-1.69%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.70%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.20%	-0.38%	-0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEMD	BLST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.95%	2.25%	+3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.95%	2.27%	+3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.95%	2.27%	+3.68%

TEMD vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BLST's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEMD vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison

TEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than BLST's 3.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	3.71%	2.11%
TEMD Templeton Emerging Markets Debt ETF	3.06%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEMD and BLST in my portfolio?

TEMD and BLST have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TEMD or BLST?

On fees, BLST is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEMD or BLST?

BLST is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for TEMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEMD or BLST?

BLST has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 3.06% for TEMD.

What is the main difference between TEMD and BLST?

TEMD is categorized as Actively Managed, while BLST is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for TEMD and 0.23% for BLST.