TEMD vs. USFI
TEMD (Templeton Emerging Markets Debt ETF) and USFI (BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TEMD charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for USFI.
Performance
TEMD vs. USFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TEMD
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
USFI
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.05K | $7.21K | $12.55K | |
| $228.87 | $276.61 | $7.08K |
TEMD vs. USFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TEMD Templeton Emerging Markets Debt ETF | 0.84% |
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMD and USFI is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEMD vs. USFI — Risk / Return Rank
TEMD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USFI
TEMD vs. USFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Emerging Markets Debt ETF (TEMD) and BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEMD | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEMD vs. USFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMD drawdown since its inception was -4.34%, smaller than the maximum USFI drawdown of -8.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMD and USFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMD | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -8.47% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -1.11% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.21% | -2.06% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.47% | — |
Volatility
TEMD vs. USFI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEMD | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.77% | 3.22% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.77% | 6.85% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.77% | 6.85% | -1.08% |
TEMD vs. USFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than USFI's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEMD vs. USFI - Dividend Comparison
TEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than USFI's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMD Templeton Emerging Markets Debt ETF | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF | 4.46% | 4.42% | 4.60% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEMD and USFI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USFI is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USFI is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for TEMD.
USFI has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 3.10% for TEMD.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and BrandywineGLOBAL. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for TEMD and 0.39% for USFI.
Find the right allocation for TEMD and USFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer