TE vs. FLNC
TE (T1 Energy Inc) and FLNC (Fluence Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. TE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while FLNC operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities). Over the past 3 years, TE returned 15.47%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for FLNC. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TE vs. FLNC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TE achieves a 72.16% return, which is significantly higher than FLNC's 25.63% return.
TE
- 1D
- -4.49%
- 1M
- 125.49%
- YTD
- 72.16%
- 6M
- 154.42%
- 1Y
- 908.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLNC
- 1D
- -10.96%
- 1M
- 101.54%
- YTD
- 25.63%
- 6M
- 25.19%
- 1Y
- 420.96%
- 3Y*
- 1.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TE vs. FLNC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TE T1 Energy Inc | 72.16% | 158.91% | 37.97% | -78.46% | -22.36% | 3.52% |
FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc. | 25.63% | 24.56% | -33.42% | 39.07% | -51.77% | 1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TE and FLNC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021 | 0.47 |
Fundamentals
TE:
$2.51B
FLNC:
$3.28B
TE:
-$2.08
FLNC:
-$0.26
TE:
12.10
FLNC:
1.52
TE:
10.80
FLNC:
8.91
TE:
$168.46M
FLNC:
$2.58B
TE:
$55.58M
FLNC:
$301.68M
TE:
-$161.82M
FLNC:
$4.46M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TE vs. FLNC — Risk / Return Rank
TE
FLNC
TE vs. FLNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T1 Energy Inc (TE) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TE | FLNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 7.23 | 3.37 | +3.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.63 | 3.39 | +1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.44 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.67 | 6.71 | +8.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.95 | 13.62 | +24.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TE | FLNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.23 | 3.37 | +3.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | -0.07 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
TE vs. FLNC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TE drawdown since its inception was -94.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FLNC drawdown of -90.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TE and FLNC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TE | FLNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.09% | -90.40% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.59% | -63.30% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.35% | -88.40% | -1.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.48% | -33.93% | +5.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.37% | -53.85% | -6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.15% | 31.10% | -6.95% |
Volatility
TE vs. FLNC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T1 Energy Inc (TE) is 46.44%, while Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) has a volatility of 62.52%. This indicates that TE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TE | FLNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.44% | 62.52% | -16.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 88.35% | 92.96% | -4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 127.17% | 126.14% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.95% | 98.23% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.95% | 98.23% | +2.72% |
Dividends
TE vs. FLNC - Dividend Comparison
Neither TE nor FLNC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TE vs. FLNC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between T1 Energy Inc and Fluence Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TE and FLNC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLNC has higher volatility (62.52%) compared to TE (46.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TE dropped -94.09% vs FLNC's -90.40%.
TE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.23 vs 3.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TE and FLNC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer