TE vs. FLNC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T1 Energy Inc (TE) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC).

Performance

TE vs. FLNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T1 Energy Inc (TE) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TE vs. FLNC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TE T1 Energy Inc	-32.93%	158.91%	37.97%	-78.46%	-22.36%	3.52%
FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc.	-34.18%	24.56%	-33.42%	39.07%	-51.77%	1.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TE : $978.42M FLNC : $1.71B
EPS TE : -$2.08 FLNC : -$0.31
PS Ratio TE : 4.72 FLNC : 0.85
PB Ratio TE : 4.21 FLNC : 4.41
Total Revenue (TTM) TE : $168.46M FLNC : $2.55B
Gross Profit (TTM) TE : $55.58M FLNC : $297.63M
EBITDA (TTM) TE : -$161.82M FLNC : -$28.21M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TE having a -32.93% return and FLNC slightly lower at -34.18%.

TE

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -34.50%
• YTD: -32.93%
• 6M: 87.45%
• 1Y: 267.21%
• 3Y*: -20.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLNC

• 1D: -5.38%
• 1M: -13.89%
• YTD: -34.18%
• 6M: -3.20%
• 1Y: 171.25%
• 3Y*: -13.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TE vs. FLNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TE

TE Risk / Return Rank: 90
TE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
TE Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
TE Omega Ratio Rank: 83
TE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
TE Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FLNC

FLNC Risk / Return Rank: 83
FLNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FLNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FLNC Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FLNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FLNC Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TE vs. FLNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T1 Energy Inc (TE) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TE	FLNC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	1.56	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.32	+0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.30	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.76	2.82	+1.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.24	6.86	+6.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TE vs. FLNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TE Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the FLNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TE and FLNC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TE	FLNC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	1.56	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	-0.21	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between TE and FLNC is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TE vs. FLNC - Dividend Comparison

Neither TE nor FLNC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TE vs. FLNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TE drawdown since its inception was -94.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FLNC drawdown of -90.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TE and FLNC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TE	FLNC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.09%	-90.40%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.74%	-59.66%	+5.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.14%	-65.38%	-6.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.37%	-53.82%	-6.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.30%	24.56%	-5.26%

Volatility

TE vs. FLNC - Volatility Comparison

T1 Energy Inc (TE) has a higher volatility of 36.70% compared to Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) at 22.88%. This indicates that TE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TE	FLNC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	36.70%	22.88%	+13.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	95.17%	89.10%	+6.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	119.46%	110.74%	+8.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	99.05%	93.73%	+5.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	99.05%	93.73%	+5.32%

Financials