TE vs. EOSE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TE (T1 Energy Inc) and EOSE (Eos Energy Enterprises Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 3 years, TE returned 15.47%/yr vs 49.99%/yr for EOSE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TE vs. EOSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T1 Energy Inc (TE) and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TE achieves a 72.16% return, which is significantly higher than EOSE's -28.45% return.

TE

• 1D: -4.49%
• 1M: 125.49%
• YTD: 72.16%
• 6M: 154.42%
• 1Y: 908.77%
• 3Y*: 15.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EOSE

• 1D: -12.95%
• 1M: 28.53%
• YTD: -28.45%
• 6M: -39.48%
• 1Y: 112.44%
• 3Y*: 49.99%
• 5Y*: -16.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TE vs. EOSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TE T1 Energy Inc	72.16%	158.91%	37.97%	-78.46%	-22.36%	18.31%
EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises Inc	-28.45%	135.80%	345.87%	-26.35%	-80.32%	-57.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TE and EOSE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2021	0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap TE : $2.51B EOSE : $4.47B
EPS TE : -$2.08 EOSE : -$1.45
PS Ratio TE : 12.10 EOSE : 16.77
Total Revenue (TTM) TE : $168.46M EOSE : $160.71M
Gross Profit (TTM) TE : $55.58M EOSE : -$163.73M
EBITDA (TTM) TE : -$161.82M EOSE : -$858.77M

Return for Risk

TE vs. EOSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TE

TE Risk / Return Rank: 97
TE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TE Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
TE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
TE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
TE Martin Ratio Rank: 98

EOSE

EOSE Risk / Return Rank: 70
EOSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EOSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
EOSE Omega Ratio Rank: 71
EOSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
EOSE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TE vs. EOSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T1 Energy Inc (TE) and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TE	EOSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.23	0.99	+6.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.63	1.96	+2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.24	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.67	1.47	+14.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	37.95	2.96	+34.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TE vs. EOSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TE Sharpe Ratio is 7.23, which is higher than the EOSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TE and EOSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TE	EOSE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.23	0.99	+6.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	-0.02	+0.07

Drawdowns

TE vs. EOSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TE drawdown since its inception was -94.09%, roughly equal to the maximum EOSE drawdown of -97.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TE and EOSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	TE	EOSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.09%	-97.88%	+3.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.59%	-77.10%	+18.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-90.35%	-87.18%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-96.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.48%	-73.06%	+44.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.37%	-72.39%	+12.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.15%	38.12%	-13.97%

Volatility

TE vs. EOSE - Volatility Comparison

T1 Energy Inc (TE) has a higher volatility of 46.44% compared to Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) at 37.17%. This indicates that TE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EOSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TE	EOSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	46.44%	37.17%	+9.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	88.35%	92.31%	-3.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	127.17%	114.61%	+12.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	100.95%	117.03%	-16.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	100.95%	113.02%	-12.07%

Dividends

TE vs. EOSE - Dividend Comparison

Neither TE nor EOSE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TE and EOSE in my portfolio?

TE and EOSE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TE or EOSE?

TE has higher volatility (46.44%) compared to EOSE (37.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TE dropped -94.09% vs EOSE's -97.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.23 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.