PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TE vs. PL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TE vs. PL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T1 Energy Inc (TE) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TE achieves a -37.57% return, which is significantly lower than PL's 3.85% return.


TE

1D
-2.34%
1M
-51.29%
6M
-49.94%
YTD
-37.57%
1Y
259.48%
3Y*
-20.50%
5Y*
-14.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-14.92%

PL

1D
1.29%
1M
-34.74%
6M
-17.98%
YTD
3.85%
1Y
231.39%
3Y*
75.79%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$154.63M$194.28M$413.79M
$226.67M$236.51M$308.29M

TE vs. PL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TE
T1 Energy Inc
-37.57%158.91%37.97%-78.46%-22.36%4.88%
PL
Planet Labs PBC
3.85%388.12%63.56%-43.22%-29.27%-45.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TE and PL is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.45

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TE:

$724.04M

PL:

$6.82B

EPS

TE:

-$1.97

PL:

-$1.15

PS Ratio

TE:

4.65

PL:

19.77

PB Ratio

TE:

3.92

PL:

15.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

TE:

$168.46M

PL:

$335.61M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TE:

$55.58M

PL:

$186.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

TE:

-$161.82M

PL:

-$125.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TE vs. PL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TE
TE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PL
PL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TE vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T1 Energy Inc (TE) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.69

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.81

10.35

-1.54

TE vs. PL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the PL Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TE and PL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TE vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TE drawdown since its inception was -94.09%, which is greater than PL's maximum drawdown of -85.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TE and PL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.09%

-85.11%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.10%

-62.12%

-6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.00%

-62.12%

-25.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.07%

-60.16%

-13.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-55.22%

-4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.58%

22.11%

+6.47%

Volatility

TE vs. PL - Volatility Comparison

T1 Energy Inc (TE) has a higher volatility of 36.74% compared to Planet Labs PBC (PL) at 18.15%. This indicates that TE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.74%

18.15%

+18.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.43%

73.79%

+18.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.79%

104.24%

+27.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.09%

84.73%

+17.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.84%

84.73%

+17.11%

Dividends

TE vs. PL - Dividend Comparison

Neither TE nor PL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TE vs. PL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between T1 Energy Inc and Planet Labs PBC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TE and PL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TE has higher volatility (36.74%) compared to PL (18.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TE dropped -94.09% vs PL's -85.11%.

PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TE and PL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer