TDV vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
TDV and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both TDV and QLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TDV vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TDV vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | -1.87% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 28.29% | 29.00% | 3.67% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -13.35% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 12.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDV achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -13.35% return.
TDV
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -1.46%
- 1Y
- 17.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
QLD
- 1D
- 6.72%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 35.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDV vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDV has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TDV vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
TDV
QLD
TDV vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDV | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.84 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 1.43 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.49 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 4.88 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDV | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.84 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.34 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.53 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between TDV and QLD is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TDV vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.17% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
TDV vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDV drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDV and QLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDV | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -83.13% | +50.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -25.13% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -63.68% | +38.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | -20.10% | +13.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -18.30% | +12.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 7.67% | -4.15% |
Volatility
TDV vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) is 6.19%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that TDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TDV | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 12.96% | -6.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.41% | 25.55% | -12.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.83% | 44.91% | -21.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 44.77% | -24.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 44.47% | -21.15% |