PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDV vs. PBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDV vs. PBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDV achieves a 23.61% return, which is significantly lower than PBD's 39.81% return.


TDV

1D
1.45%
1M
10.43%
YTD
23.61%
6M
23.27%
1Y
38.71%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
14.36%
10Y*

PBD

1D
0.45%
1M
6.95%
YTD
39.81%
6M
41.76%
1Y
96.83%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
-3.25%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDV vs. PBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TDV
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
23.61%16.05%9.72%27.29%-15.94%28.29%29.00%3.67%
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
39.81%43.65%-26.39%-10.69%-29.70%-22.30%145.46%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TDV and PBD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.68

The correlation between TDV and PBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

TDV vs. PBD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDV
PBD

Technology

90.2%
6.8%

Industrials

5.1%
48.1%

Financial Services

4.7%
1.2%

Basic Materials

-

3.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.9%

Energy

-

12.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

12.0%

Technology

TDV
90.2%
PBD
6.8%

Industrials

TDV
5.1%
PBD
48.1%

Financial Services

TDV
4.7%
PBD
1.2%

Basic Materials

TDV

-

PBD
3.4%

Communication Services

TDV

-

PBD

-

Consumer Cyclical

TDV

-

PBD
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

TDV

-

PBD
0.9%

Energy

TDV

-

PBD
12.4%

Healthcare

TDV

-

PBD

-

Real Estate

TDV

-

PBD

-

Utilities

TDV

-

PBD
12.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDV vs. PBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDV
TDV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PBD
PBD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDV vs. PBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDVPBDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

4.17

-1.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.01

4.82

-1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.63

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

9.03

-4.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.24

28.22

-13.98

TDV vs. PBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is lower than the PBD Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDV and PBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDVPBDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

4.17

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

-0.12

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.03

+0.73

Drawdowns

TDV vs. PBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDV drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum PBD drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDV and PBD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDVPBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-78.60%

+45.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-10.70%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.51%

-52.45%

+29.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-69.15%

+44.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-38.44%

+38.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-53.40%

+48.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.43%

-0.67%

Volatility

TDV vs. PBD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) is 5.01%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that TDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDVPBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

8.49%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

17.06%

-4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.28%

23.38%

-6.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.46%

28.37%

-7.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.21%

27.26%

-4.05%

TDV vs. PBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDV has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than PBD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDV vs. PBD - Dividend Comparison

TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than PBD's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
1.61%2.71%1.81%2.85%2.98%0.67%0.48%1.83%1.86%1.76%2.04%1.24%
TDV
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
0.93%1.09%1.16%1.16%1.67%1.08%1.10%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDV and PBD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBD has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to TDV (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDV dropped -32.78% vs PBD's -78.60%.

On 5-year performance, TDV leads with 14.36% vs -3.25% for PBD. On fees, TDV is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TDV has performed better with a 14.36% return vs -3.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDV is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.

PBD has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.93% for TDV.

TDV is categorized as Technology Equities, while PBD is Alternative Energy Equities. TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index, while PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for TDV and 0.75% for PBD.

PBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDV and PBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer