TDV vs. PBD
TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and PBD (Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index, while PBD is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDV returned 14.36%/yr vs -3.25%/yr for PBD. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDV charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PBD.
Performance
TDV vs. PBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDV achieves a 23.61% return, which is significantly lower than PBD's 39.81% return.
TDV
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 10.43%
- YTD
- 23.61%
- 6M
- 23.27%
- 1Y
- 38.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 14.36%
- 10Y*
- —
PBD
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 39.81%
- 6M
- 41.76%
- 1Y
- 96.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
TDV vs. PBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 23.61% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 28.29% | 29.00% | 3.67% |
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 39.81% | 43.65% | -26.39% | -10.69% | -29.70% | -22.30% | 145.46% | 12.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDV and PBD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between TDV and PBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
TDV vs. PBD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDV
PBD
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TDV
PBD
Industrials
TDV
PBD
Financial Services
TDV
PBD
Basic Materials
TDV
-
PBD
Communication Services
TDV
-
PBD
-
Consumer Cyclical
TDV
-
PBD
Consumer Defensive
TDV
-
PBD
Energy
TDV
-
PBD
Healthcare
TDV
-
PBD
-
Real Estate
TDV
-
PBD
-
Utilities
TDV
-
PBD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDV vs. PBD — Risk / Return Rank
TDV
PBD
TDV vs. PBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDV | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 4.17 | -1.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | 4.82 | -1.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.63 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 9.03 | -4.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.24 | 28.22 | -13.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDV | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 4.17 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | -0.12 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.03 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
TDV vs. PBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDV drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum PBD drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDV and PBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDV | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -78.60% | +45.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -10.70% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.51% | -52.45% | +29.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -69.15% | +44.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -38.44% | +38.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -53.40% | +48.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.43% | -0.67% |
Volatility
TDV vs. PBD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) is 5.01%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that TDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDV | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 8.49% | -3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.71% | 17.06% | -4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.28% | 23.38% | -6.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 28.37% | -7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 27.26% | -4.05% |
TDV vs. PBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDV has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than PBD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDV vs. PBD - Dividend Comparison
TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than PBD's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.61% | 2.71% | 1.81% | 2.85% | 2.98% | 0.67% | 0.48% | 1.83% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.04% | 1.24% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 0.93% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDV and PBD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBD has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to TDV (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDV dropped -32.78% vs PBD's -78.60%.
On 5-year performance, TDV leads with 14.36% vs -3.25% for PBD. On fees, TDV is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDV has performed better with a 14.36% return vs -3.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDV is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.
PBD has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.93% for TDV.
TDV is categorized as Technology Equities, while PBD is Alternative Energy Equities. TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index, while PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for TDV and 0.75% for PBD.
PBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDV and PBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer