TDV vs. SMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV).
TDV and SMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019. SMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. Both TDV and SMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TDV vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TDV vs. SMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | -1.22% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 28.29% | 29.00% | 3.67% |
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 5.41% | 0.26% | 7.03% | 8.99% | -5.90% | 18.98% | -4.74% | 2.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDV achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than SMDV's 5.41% return.
TDV
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -1.30%
- 1Y
- 18.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SMDV
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- 5.41%
- 6M
- 5.80%
- 1Y
- 8.17%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDV vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDV has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TDV vs. SMDV — Risk / Return Rank
TDV
SMDV
TDV vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDV | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.45 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 0.79 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.10 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 0.77 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.19 | 2.24 | +2.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDV | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.45 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.20 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.37 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between TDV and SMDV is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TDV vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison
TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than SMDV's 2.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 2.50% | 2.67% | 2.68% | 2.69% | 2.51% | 2.02% | 2.13% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 1.84% | 1.35% | 1.81% |
Drawdowns
TDV vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDV drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, roughly equal to the maximum SMDV drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDV and SMDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDV | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -34.12% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -10.94% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -21.23% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -5.79% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -5.99% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 3.75% | -0.21% |
Volatility
TDV vs. SMDV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) at 4.34%. This indicates that TDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TDV | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 4.34% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.42% | 10.68% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.83% | 18.25% | +5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 18.71% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 20.71% | +2.61% |