PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIV vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 19.03% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 18.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TDIV having a 18.56% annualized return and CIBR not far behind at 17.93%.


TDIV

1D
-2.33%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
19.03%
6M
18.00%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
17.24%
10Y*
18.56%

CIBR

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
18.06%
6M
15.86%
1Y
15.20%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
17.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
19.03%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
18.06%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and CIBR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.73

The correlation between TDIV and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TDIV vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDIV
CIBR

Technology

87.1%
95.4%

Communication Services

11.6%
1.9%

Industrials

1.3%
2.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TDIV
87.1%
CIBR
95.4%

Communication Services

TDIV
11.6%
CIBR
1.9%

Industrials

TDIV
1.3%
CIBR
2.7%

Basic Materials

TDIV

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Cyclical

TDIV

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

TDIV

-

CIBR

-

Energy

TDIV

-

CIBR

-

Financial Services

TDIV

-

CIBR

-

Healthcare

TDIV

-

CIBR

-

Real Estate

TDIV

-

CIBR

-

Utilities

TDIV

-

CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIV vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDIVCIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.12

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

0.69

+2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.56

1.60

+6.96

TDIV vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIVCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-33.89%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

-21.99%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

-21.99%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-33.89%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

-33.89%

+1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.47%

-10.72%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-8.66%

+3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

9.51%

-5.53%

Volatility

TDIV vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) is 10.50%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.03%. This indicates that TDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIVCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.50%

12.03%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

21.54%

-5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

25.21%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.97%

25.07%

-4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

23.60%

-2.64%

TDIV vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDIV vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than CIBR's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.49%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.22%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIV and CIBR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (12.03%) compared to TDIV (10.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 18.56% vs 17.93% for CIBR. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDIV has been the lower-risk option at 10.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 17.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.49% for CIBR.

TDIV is categorized as Technology Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.60% for CIBR.

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer