TCOM vs. GMED
TCOM (Trip.com Group Limited) and GMED (Globus Medical, Inc.) are both stocks. TCOM operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical), while GMED operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, TCOM returned 1.05%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for GMED. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TCOM vs. GMED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCOM achieves a -34.63% return, which is significantly lower than GMED's -9.76% return. Over the past 10 years, TCOM has underperformed GMED with an annualized return of 1.05%, while GMED has yielded a comparatively higher 12.86% annualized return.
TCOM
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 14.44%
- 6M
- -23.40%
- YTD
- -34.63%
- 1Y
- -24.12%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.75%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.55%
GMED
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- 6M
- -13.11%
- YTD
- -9.76%
- 1Y
- 49.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- -1.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $96.46M | $126.87M | $149.45M | |
| $161.73M | $136.85M | $152.49M |
TCOM vs. GMED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCOM Trip.com Group Limited | -34.63% | 5.24% | 90.67% | 4.68% | 39.72% | -27.01% | 0.57% | 23.95% | -38.64% | 10.25% |
GMED Globus Medical, Inc. | -9.76% | 5.56% | 55.21% | -28.25% | 2.87% | 10.70% | 10.77% | 36.04% | 5.30% | 65.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCOM and GMED is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.22 |
The correlation between TCOM and GMED shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TCOM:
$29.60B
GMED:
$10.63B
TCOM:
CN¥45.41
GMED:
$4.28
TCOM:
6.99
GMED:
18.39
TCOM:
0.04
GMED:
0.19
TCOM:
3.41
GMED:
3.48
TCOM:
1.32
GMED:
2.30
TCOM:
CN¥64.48B
GMED:
$3.10B
TCOM:
CN¥51.79B
GMED:
$1.58B
TCOM:
CN¥39.20B
GMED:
$803.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCOM vs. GMED — Risk / Return Rank
TCOM
GMED
TCOM vs. GMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCOM | GMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.26 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 2.26 | -2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 4.92 | -5.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCOM vs. GMED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCOM drawdown since its inception was -76.34%, which is greater than GMED's maximum drawdown of -47.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCOM and GMED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCOM | GMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.34% | -47.91% | -28.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.54% | -22.10% | -27.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.54% | -44.40% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.54% | -47.91% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.96% | -47.91% | -24.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.46% | -18.62% | -21.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.93% | -15.35% | -12.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.19% | 10.13% | +17.06% |
Volatility
TCOM vs. GMED - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) is 7.88%, while Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that TCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCOM | GMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 12.47% | -4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.85% | 26.28% | -1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.45% | 49.44% | -10.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.11% | 38.45% | +10.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.47% | 35.41% | +9.06% |
Dividends
TCOM vs. GMED - Dividend Comparison
Neither TCOM nor GMED has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GMED Globus Medical, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCOM Trip.com Group Limited | 0.00% | 0.42% |
Financials
TCOM vs. GMED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trip.com Group Limited and Globus Medical, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TCOM vs. GMED - Profitability Comparison
TCOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a gross profit of 12.80B and revenue of 16.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.5%.
GMED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 759.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TCOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported an operating income of 3.92B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.
GMED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported an operating income of 150.39M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.
TCOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
GMED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a net income of 124.30M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TCOM and GMED have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMED has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to TCOM (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCOM dropped -76.34% vs GMED's -47.91%.
GMED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCOM and GMED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer