TCOM vs. BKNG

In the year-to-date period, TCOM achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly lower than BKNG's 5.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TCOM has underperformed BKNG with an annualized return of 6.38%, while BKNG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.01% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TCOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the BKNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCOM and BKNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than BKNG's 0.69% yield.

The maximum TCOM drawdown since its inception was -76.34%, smaller than the maximum BKNG drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCOM and BKNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) have volatilities of 8.10% and 8.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trip.com Group Limited and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.