GMED vs. ISRG

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GMED having a 53.76% return and ISRG slightly higher at 55.30%. Over the past 10 years, GMED has underperformed ISRG with an annualized return of 13.00%, while ISRG has yielded a comparatively higher 24.39% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GMED Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the ISRG Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMED and ISRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither GMED nor ISRG has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GMED drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum ISRG drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMED and ISRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) is 4.84%, while Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that GMED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Globus Medical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.