PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GMED vs. ISRG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GMEDISRG
YTD Return52.19%59.41%
1Y Return77.04%83.41%
3Y Return (Ann)4.65%15.05%
5Y Return (Ann)8.12%23.21%
10Y Return (Ann)13.74%25.26%
Sharpe Ratio2.303.14
Sortino Ratio3.644.78
Omega Ratio1.481.60
Calmar Ratio1.614.27
Martin Ratio16.4032.03
Ulcer Index4.64%2.64%
Daily Std Dev33.07%26.88%
Max Drawdown-47.91%-82.25%
Current Drawdown-3.52%0.00%

Fundamentals


GMEDISRG
Market Cap$11.36B$191.29B
EPS$0.62$6.21
PE Ratio134.5586.48
PEG Ratio2.173.97
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.48B$7.87B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.38B$5.27B
EBITDA (TTM)$366.24M$2.52B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GMED and ISRG is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GMED vs. ISRG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GMED achieves a 52.19% return, which is significantly lower than ISRG's 59.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GMED has underperformed ISRG with an annualized return of 13.74%, while ISRG has yielded a comparatively higher 25.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
26.82%
35.66%
GMED
ISRG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GMED vs. ISRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMED
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GMED, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GMED, currently valued at 3.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GMED, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GMED, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GMED, currently valued at 16.40, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.40
ISRG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ISRG, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ISRG, currently valued at 4.78, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ISRG, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.60
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ISRG, currently valued at 4.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ISRG, currently valued at 32.03, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0032.03

GMED vs. ISRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMED Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the ISRG Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMED and ISRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.30
3.14
GMED
ISRG

Dividends

GMED vs. ISRG - Dividend Comparison

Neither GMED nor ISRG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GMED vs. ISRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMED drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum ISRG drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMED and ISRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.52%
0
GMED
ISRG

Volatility

GMED vs. ISRG - Volatility Comparison

Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) have volatilities of 10.63% and 10.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.63%
10.33%
GMED
ISRG

Financials

GMED vs. ISRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Globus Medical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items