PortfoliosLab logo
GMED vs. JNJ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GMED and JNJ is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GMED vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GMED:

-0.30

JNJ:

0.55

Sortino Ratio

GMED:

-0.10

JNJ:

0.89

Omega Ratio

GMED:

0.98

JNJ:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

GMED:

-0.24

JNJ:

0.64

Martin Ratio

GMED:

-0.70

JNJ:

1.68

Ulcer Index

GMED:

13.70%

JNJ:

6.54%

Daily Std Dev

GMED:

36.91%

JNJ:

18.83%

Max Drawdown

GMED:

-47.91%

JNJ:

-52.60%

Current Drawdown

GMED:

-36.58%

JNJ:

-8.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GMED:

$8.02B

JNJ:

$369.52B

EPS

GMED:

$1.33

JNJ:

$8.98

PE Ratio

GMED:

44.28

JNJ:

17.10

PEG Ratio

GMED:

1.70

JNJ:

1.04

PS Ratio

GMED:

3.19

JNJ:

4.14

PB Ratio

GMED:

1.95

JNJ:

4.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

GMED:

$2.51B

JNJ:

$89.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GMED:

$1.43B

JNJ:

$61.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

GMED:

$486.48M

JNJ:

$34.70B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMED achieves a -28.45% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 9.11% return. Over the past 10 years, GMED has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 8.80%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.44% annualized return.


GMED

YTD

-28.45%

1M

-17.54%

6M

-30.87%

1Y

-11.13%

3Y*

-3.86%

5Y*

1.61%

10Y*

8.80%

JNJ

YTD

9.11%

1M

0.15%

6M

1.79%

1Y

10.31%

3Y*

-1.81%

5Y*

3.76%

10Y*

7.44%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Globus Medical, Inc.

Johnson & Johnson

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GMED vs. JNJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMED
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GMED is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GMED is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GMED is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GMED is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GMED is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GMED is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JNJ is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JNJ is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JNJ is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JNJ is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JNJ is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JNJ is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GMED vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GMED Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMED and JNJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GMED vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

GMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GMED
Globus Medical, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
3.23%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%2.64%

Drawdowns

GMED vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMED drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum JNJ drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMED and JNJ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GMED vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) has a higher volatility of 28.22% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 6.09%. This indicates that GMED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GMED vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Globus Medical, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
598.12M
21.89B
(GMED) Total Revenue
(JNJ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GMED vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Globus Medical, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%20212022202320242025
67.3%
66.4%
(GMED) Gross Margin
(JNJ) Gross Margin
GMED - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 402.72M and revenue of 598.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.

JNJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 14.54B and revenue of 21.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

GMED - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Globus Medical, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.00M and revenue of 598.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

JNJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.30B and revenue of 21.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

GMED - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a net income of 75.46M and revenue of 598.12M, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.

JNJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 11.00B and revenue of 21.89B, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.