PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GMED vs. EW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GMEDEW
YTD Return52.19%-13.23%
1Y Return77.04%-1.27%
3Y Return (Ann)4.65%-17.28%
5Y Return (Ann)8.12%-4.18%
10Y Return (Ann)13.74%12.17%
Sharpe Ratio2.300.01
Sortino Ratio3.640.30
Omega Ratio1.481.06
Calmar Ratio1.610.01
Martin Ratio16.400.03
Ulcer Index4.64%17.55%
Daily Std Dev33.07%41.40%
Max Drawdown-47.91%-54.32%
Current Drawdown-3.52%-49.37%

Fundamentals


GMEDEW
Market Cap$11.36B$39.34B
EPS$0.62$2.55
PE Ratio134.5525.81
PEG Ratio2.176.08
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.48B$5.87B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.38B$4.57B
EBITDA (TTM)$366.24M$1.70B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GMED and EW is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GMED vs. EW - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GMED achieves a 52.19% return, which is significantly higher than EW's -13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GMED has outperformed EW with an annualized return of 13.74%, while EW has yielded a comparatively lower 12.17% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
26.82%
-26.58%
GMED
EW

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GMED vs. EW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMED
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GMED, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GMED, currently valued at 3.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GMED, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GMED, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GMED, currently valued at 16.40, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.40
EW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EW, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.01
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EW, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EW, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EW, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EW, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.03

GMED vs. EW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMED Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the EW Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMED and EW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.30
0.01
GMED
EW

Dividends

GMED vs. EW - Dividend Comparison

Neither GMED nor EW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GMED vs. EW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMED drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum EW drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMED and EW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.52%
-49.37%
GMED
EW

Volatility

GMED vs. EW - Volatility Comparison

Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) at 5.89%. This indicates that GMED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.63%
5.89%
GMED
EW

Financials

GMED vs. EW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Globus Medical, Inc. and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items