PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCOM vs. ^SP500TR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TCOM vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TCOM vs. ^SP500TR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCOM
Trip.com Group Limited
-29.80%5.24%90.67%4.68%39.72%-27.01%0.57%23.95%-38.64%10.25%
^SP500TR
S&P 500 Total Return
-3.53%17.88%25.02%26.29%-18.11%28.71%18.40%31.49%-4.38%21.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCOM achieves a -29.80% return, which is significantly lower than ^SP500TR's -3.53% return. Over the past 10 years, TCOM has underperformed ^SP500TR with an annualized return of 1.34%, while ^SP500TR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.


TCOM

1D
1.39%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
-29.80%
6M
-32.85%
1Y
-20.60%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
4.79%
10Y*
1.34%

^SP500TR

1D
0.12%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
-3.53%
6M
-1.37%
1Y
17.55%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
14.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCOM vs. ^SP500TR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCOM
TCOM Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP500TR
^SP500TR Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCOM vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCOM^SP500TRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.53

0.96

-1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.53

1.48

-2.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.23

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

1.51

-2.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.26

7.14

-8.40

TCOM vs. ^SP500TR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCOM Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCOM and ^SP500TR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCOM^SP500TRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

0.96

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.71

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.79

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.62

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between TCOM and ^SP500TR is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

TCOM vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCOM drawdown since its inception was -76.34%, which is greater than ^SP500TR's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCOM and ^SP500TR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TCOM^SP500TRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.34%

-55.25%

-21.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.59%

-8.89%

-29.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.98%

-24.49%

-35.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.96%

-33.79%

-38.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.07%

-5.44%

-30.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.77%

-8.20%

-19.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.97%

2.57%

+13.40%

Volatility

TCOM vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison

Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) at 5.30%. This indicates that TCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP500TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TCOM^SP500TRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

5.30%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.22%

9.55%

+17.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.96%

18.32%

+20.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.39%

16.90%

+32.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.39%

18.04%

+26.35%