PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMED vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMED vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMED achieves a -8.33% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, GMED has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 12.87%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.


GMED

1D
1.07%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
-8.33%
6M
-9.83%
1Y
38.45%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
1.52%
10Y*
12.87%

QQQ

1D
-3.29%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
16.45%
6M
14.99%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
22.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMED vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMED
Globus Medical, Inc.
-8.33%5.56%55.21%-28.25%2.87%10.70%10.77%36.04%5.30%65.66%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.45%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GMED and QQQ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.41

The correlation between GMED and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMED vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMED
GMED Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMED Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMED Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMED vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMEDQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.93

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

10.86

-6.41

GMED vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMED Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMED and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMED vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMED drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMED and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMEDQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.91%

-82.97%

+35.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.10%

-11.96%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.40%

-22.77%

-21.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.91%

-35.12%

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.91%

-35.12%

-12.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.33%

-4.25%

-13.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.33%

-32.73%

+17.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.65%

3.22%

+5.43%

Volatility

GMED vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 9.17%. This indicates that GMED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMEDQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.78%

9.17%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.54%

14.57%

+8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.64%

17.96%

+30.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.04%

22.69%

+15.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.54%

22.42%

+13.12%

Dividends

GMED vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

GMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMED
Globus Medical, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMED and QQQ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMED has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to QQQ (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMED dropped -47.91% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMED and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer