TCNNF vs. CRML

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TCNNF (Trulieve Cannabis Corp) and CRML (Critical Metals Corp) are both stocks. TCNNF operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare), while CRML operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

TCNNF vs. CRML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TCNNF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CRML

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -42.57%
• 6M: -58.31%
• YTD: -20.89%
• 1Y: 44.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -18.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRML Critical Metals Corp	$35.75M	$39.93M	$77.94M
TCNNF Trulieve Cannabis Corp	$0.00	$2.71K	$993.73K

TCNNF vs. CRML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TCNNF Trulieve Cannabis Corp	-3.18%
CRML Critical Metals Corp	-43.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TCNNF and CRML is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2026	0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap TCNNF : $1.56B CRML : $512.97M
Total Revenue (TTM) TCNNF : $1.17B CRML : $560.62K
Gross Profit (TTM) TCNNF : $670.85M CRML : $560.62K
EBITDA (TTM) TCNNF : $276.20M CRML : -$47.47M

Return for Risk

TCNNF vs. CRML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCNNF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRML

CRML Risk / Return Rank: 63
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCNNF vs. CRML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TCNNF	CRML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.29	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.78	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.55	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.78	—

Drawdowns

TCNNF vs. CRML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCNNF drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum CRML drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCNNF and CRML.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCNNF	CRML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.15%	-93.91%	+82.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-82.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.77%	-81.68%	+72.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.54%	-68.37%	+58.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	58.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TCNNF	CRML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	84.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.92%	155.87%	-121.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.92%	181.19%	-147.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.92%	181.19%	-147.27%

Dividends

TCNNF vs. CRML - Dividend Comparison

Neither TCNNF nor CRML has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCNNF and CRML in my portfolio?

TCNNF and CRML have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.