TCHP vs. TCAL
TCHP (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF) and TCAL (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TCAL is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCHP returned 20.05% vs -1.87% for TCAL. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TCHP charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for TCAL.
Performance
TCHP vs. TCAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCHP achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly higher than TCAL's -2.88% return.
TCHP
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
TCAL
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- -2.88%
- 6M
- -2.97%
- 1Y
- -1.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCHP vs. TCAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 3.99% | 27.19% |
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | -2.88% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCHP and TCAL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.15 |
TCHP vs. TCAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TCHP
TCAL
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
TCHP
TCAL
Consumer Cyclical
TCHP
TCAL
Communication Services
TCHP
TCAL
Financial Services
TCHP
TCAL
Healthcare
TCHP
TCAL
Industrials
TCHP
TCAL
Consumer Defensive
TCHP
TCAL
Basic Materials
TCHP
TCAL
Utilities
TCHP
TCAL
Energy
TCHP
-
TCAL
Real Estate
TCHP
-
TCAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCHP vs. TCAL — Risk / Return Rank
TCHP
TCAL
TCHP vs. TCAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCHP | TCAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.97 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | -0.27 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.84 | -0.70 | +4.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCHP | TCAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | -0.20 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | -0.10 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
TCHP vs. TCAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCHP drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than TCAL's maximum drawdown of -7.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHP and TCAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCHP | TCAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -7.24% | -35.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.50% | -7.00% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -5.92% | +3.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.47% | -2.02% | -9.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.23% | 2.67% | +2.56% |
Volatility
TCHP vs. TCAL - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) at 2.46%. This indicates that TCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCHP | TCAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 2.46% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 7.08% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 9.31% | +6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 11.25% | +12.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.18% | 11.25% | +11.93% |
TCHP vs. TCAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCHP has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAL's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCHP vs. TCAL - Dividend Comparison
TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | 11.96% | 8.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCHP and TCAL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCHP has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to TCAL (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCHP dropped -42.34% vs TCAL's -7.24%.
On 1-year performance, TCHP leads with 20.05% vs -1.87% for TCAL. On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TCAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TCHP has performed better with a 20.05% return vs -1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for TCHP.
TCAL has the higher dividend yield at 11.96%, compared with 0.00% for TCHP.
TCHP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TCAL is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for TCHP and 0.34% for TCAL.
TCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCHP and TCAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer