TCAL vs. GPIQ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

TCAL (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCAL is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCAL returned 3.56% vs 30.18% for GPIQ. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TCAL charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.

Performance

TCAL vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAL achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 16.96% return.

TCAL

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 4.06%
• 6M: 1.48%
• YTD: 2.86%
• 1Y: 3.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIQ

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.06%
• 6M: 14.93%
• YTD: 16.96%
• 1Y: 30.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAL vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF	2.86%	1.89%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	16.96%	24.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAL and GPIQ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	0.14

TCAL vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TCAL	GPIQ
Healthcare	21.9%	3.6%
Industrials	20.6%	2.6%
Financial Services	13.5%	0.2%
Technology	11.6%	58.7%
Utilities	10.0%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.5%	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	11.6%
Communication Services	2.9%	14.1%
Real Estate	2.2%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.0%
Energy	1.2%	0.5%

Return for Risk

TCAL vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAL

TCAL Risk / Return Rank: 15
TCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
TCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
TCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 13
TCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
TCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 16

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 76
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 74
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAL vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TCAL	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	1.92	-1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.53	2.56	-2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.35	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	3.17	-2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.07	12.96	-11.89

TCAL vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAL and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TCAL vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAL drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAL and GPIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCAL	GPIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.24%	-21.06%	+13.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.00%	-9.51%	+2.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-1.44%	+1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-2.27%	+0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	2.32%	+0.59%

Volatility

TCAL vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) is 2.89%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that TCAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCAL	GPIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.89%	7.63%	-4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.97%	13.21%	-6.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.63%	15.73%	-6.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.19%	17.93%	-6.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.19%	17.93%	-6.74%

TCAL vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCAL vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

TCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.10%, more than GPIQ's 9.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.66%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF	12.10%	8.34%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCAL and GPIQ in my portfolio?

TCAL and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCAL or GPIQ?

GPIQ has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to TCAL (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAL dropped -7.24% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

Which ETF is better, TCAL or GPIQ?

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 30.18% vs 3.56% for TCAL. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TCAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TCAL or GPIQ?

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 30.18% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TCAL or GPIQ?

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for TCAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TCAL or GPIQ?

TCAL has the higher dividend yield at 12.10%, compared with 9.66% for GPIQ.

What is the main difference between TCAL and GPIQ?

TCAL is categorized as Derivative Income, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TCAL and 0.29% for GPIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.