PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAL vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAL vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAL achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 7.85% return.


TCAL

1D
1.05%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
-1.64%
6M
-2.59%
1Y
0.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JEPQ

1D
-2.48%
1M
0.34%
YTD
7.85%
6M
7.02%
1Y
25.10%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAL vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TCAL and JEPQ is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

0.19

TCAL vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TCAL
JEPQ

Healthcare

21.5%
3.9%

Industrials

20.9%
2.8%

Financial Services

14.0%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

11.1%
6.0%

Utilities

10.1%
1.1%

Technology

9.8%
58.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
11.8%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.2%

Communication Services

1.7%
13.9%

Basic Materials

1.7%
0.9%

Energy

1.2%
0.3%

Healthcare

TCAL
21.5%
JEPQ
3.9%

Industrials

TCAL
20.9%
JEPQ
2.8%

Financial Services

TCAL
14.0%
JEPQ
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

TCAL
11.1%
JEPQ
6.0%

Utilities

TCAL
10.1%
JEPQ
1.1%

Technology

TCAL
9.8%
JEPQ
58.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TCAL
8.1%
JEPQ
11.8%

Real Estate

TCAL
2.2%
JEPQ
0.2%

Communication Services

TCAL
1.7%
JEPQ
13.9%

Basic Materials

TCAL
1.7%
JEPQ
0.9%

Energy

TCAL
1.2%
JEPQ
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAL vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAL
TCAL Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAL vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCALJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.38

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

2.86

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

13.55

-13.53

TCAL vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAL and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCAL vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAL drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum JEPQ drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAL and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCALJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-20.07%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-8.82%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.72%

-2.48%

-2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-3.40%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

1.86%

+1.00%

Volatility

TCAL vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) is 3.09%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that TCAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCALJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

6.27%

-3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.10%

10.58%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.54%

13.08%

-3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.26%

16.79%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

16.79%

-5.53%

TCAL vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAL vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

TCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%, more than JEPQ's 10.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.22%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%
TCAL
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF
11.81%8.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCAL and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEPQ has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to TCAL (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAL dropped -7.24% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

On 1-year performance, JEPQ leads with 25.10% vs 0.07% for TCAL. On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TCAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 25.10% return vs 0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.

TCAL has the higher dividend yield at 11.81%, compared with 10.22% for JEPQ.

TCAL is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TCAL and 0.35% for JEPQ.

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAL and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer