TCAL vs. TCHP
TCAL (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF) and TCHP (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCAL is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCAL returned 0.40% vs 10.84% for TCHP. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TCAL charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for TCHP.
Performance
TCAL vs. TCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCAL achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly higher than TCHP's -1.95% return.
TCAL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- 1Y
- 0.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCHP
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -3.17%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- —
TCAL vs. TCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | -1.08% | 1.89% |
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | -1.95% | 26.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCAL and TCHP is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | 0.15 |
TCAL vs. TCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TCAL
TCHP
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Healthcare
TCAL
TCHP
Industrials
TCAL
TCHP
Financial Services
TCAL
TCHP
Consumer Defensive
TCAL
TCHP
Utilities
TCAL
TCHP
Technology
TCAL
TCHP
Consumer Cyclical
TCAL
TCHP
Real Estate
TCAL
TCHP
-
Communication Services
TCAL
TCHP
Basic Materials
TCAL
TCHP
Energy
TCAL
TCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCAL vs. TCHP — Risk / Return Rank
TCAL
TCHP
TCAL vs. TCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCAL | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.12 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 0.62 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | 2.01 | -1.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCAL vs. TCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCAL drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum TCHP drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAL and TCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCAL | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -42.34% | +35.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.00% | -17.50% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -7.79% | +3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -11.40% | +9.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 5.40% | -2.52% |
Volatility
TCAL vs. TCHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) is 3.12%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that TCAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCAL | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 6.74% | -3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 13.38% | -6.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.54% | 17.13% | -7.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 23.58% | -12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 23.21% | -11.96% |
TCAL vs. TCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCAL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than TCHP's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCAL vs. TCHP - Dividend Comparison
TCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.74%, while TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | 11.74% | 8.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCAL and TCHP have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCHP has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to TCAL (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAL dropped -7.24% vs TCHP's -42.34%.
On 1-year performance, TCHP leads with 10.84% vs 0.40% for TCAL. On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TCAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TCHP has performed better with a 10.84% return vs 0.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for TCHP.
TCAL has the higher dividend yield at 11.74%, compared with 0.00% for TCHP.
TCAL is categorized as Derivative Income, while TCHP is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TCAL and 0.57% for TCHP.
TCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCAL and TCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer