PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBB vs. AES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TBB vs. AES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) and The AES Corporation (AES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBB achieves a -5.00% return, which is significantly lower than AES's 4.65% return.


TBB

1D
-0.34%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
-5.00%
6M
-5.17%
1Y
-2.85%
3Y*
1.13%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*

AES

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
4.65%
6M
8.27%
1Y
47.96%
3Y*
-6.14%
5Y*
-7.18%
10Y*
6.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBB vs. AES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
-5.00%-3.34%10.14%14.65%-12.18%-0.72%7.21%26.60%-9.95%3.45%
AES
The AES Corporation
4.65%18.26%-30.40%-30.88%21.69%5.94%22.16%42.14%39.02%3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TBB and AES is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.22

Fundamentals

EPS

TBB:

$3.04

AES:

$1.97

PE Ratio

TBB:

6.74

AES:

7.45

PEG Ratio

TBB:

0.28

AES:

0.04

PS Ratio

TBB:

1.17

AES:

0.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

TBB:

$125.65B

AES:

$12.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TBB:

$105.41B

AES:

$1.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

TBB:

$54.70B

AES:

$2.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBB vs. AES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBB
TBB Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
TBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBB Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBB Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

AES
AES Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AES Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AES Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBB vs. AES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) and The AES Corporation (AES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBBAESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.33

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

2.54

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.55

4.70

-5.25

TBB vs. AES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBB Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the AES Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBB and AES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBB vs. AES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBB drawdown since its inception was -16.09%, smaller than the maximum AES drawdown of -98.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBB and AES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBBAESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-98.65%

+82.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-18.98%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.94%

-53.33%

+40.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.68%

-63.43%

+47.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.90%

-62.16%

+51.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-57.02%

+53.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

10.23%

-5.00%

Volatility

TBB vs. AES - Volatility Comparison

AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to The AES Corporation (AES) at 0.95%. This indicates that TBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBBAESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

0.95%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.08%

25.40%

-20.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.62%

41.72%

-33.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

37.73%

-26.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.94%

36.04%

-25.10%

Dividends

TBB vs. AES - Dividend Comparison

TBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than AES's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AES
The AES Corporation
4.80%4.91%5.36%3.45%2.20%2.48%2.44%2.74%3.60%4.43%3.79%4.18%
TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
6.51%6.01%5.48%5.70%6.17%5.13%3.63%4.99%6.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TBB vs. AES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 and The AES Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
33.47B
3.18B
(TBB) Total Revenue
(AES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TBB and AES have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBB has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to AES (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBB dropped -16.09% vs AES's -98.65%.

AES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBB and AES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer