PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBB vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TBB vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBB achieves a -3.94% return, which is significantly lower than T's -3.08% return.


TBB

1D
-1.00%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
-3.94%
6M
-4.62%
1Y
0.53%
3Y*
0.95%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*

T

1D
-4.42%
1M
-9.77%
YTD
-3.08%
6M
-4.92%
1Y
-12.10%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
3.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBB vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
-3.94%-3.34%10.14%14.65%-12.18%-0.72%7.21%26.60%-9.95%3.33%
T
AT&T Inc.
-3.08%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%18.32%

Correlation

The correlation between TBB and T is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.16

The correlation between TBB and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TBB:

$3.04

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

TBB:

6.82

T:

7.73

PEG Ratio

TBB:

0.28

T:

0.32

PS Ratio

TBB:

1.19

T:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

TBB:

$125.65B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TBB:

$105.41B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

TBB:

$54.70B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBB vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBB
TBB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBB vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBBTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.06

-0.56

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.16

-0.67

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.92

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

-0.59

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.11

-1.20

+1.32

TBB vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBB Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBB and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

-0.56

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.31

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.38

-0.10

Drawdowns

TBB vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBB drawdown since its inception was -16.09%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBB and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-64.15%

+48.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-20.60%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.94%

-20.60%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.68%

-32.01%

+16.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.90%

-18.23%

+8.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-15.72%

+12.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

10.08%

-5.38%

Volatility

TBB vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is 1.80%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that TBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

6.96%

-5.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.06%

17.27%

-12.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.82%

21.86%

-13.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.12%

23.92%

-12.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.95%

23.69%

-12.74%

Dividends

TBB vs. T - Dividend Comparison

TBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than T's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%
TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
6.44%6.01%5.48%5.70%6.17%5.13%3.63%4.99%6.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TBB vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00B35.00B40.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
33.47B
33.47B
(TBB) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TBB and T have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to TBB (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBB dropped -16.09% vs T's -64.15%.

TBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBB and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer