PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBB vs. VZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TBB vs. VZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBB achieves a -3.94% return, which is significantly lower than VZ's 18.27% return.


TBB

1D
-1.00%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
-3.94%
6M
-4.62%
1Y
0.53%
3Y*
0.95%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*

VZ

1D
-2.55%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
18.27%
6M
18.45%
1Y
13.60%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
4.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBB vs. VZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
-3.94%-3.34%10.14%14.65%-12.18%-0.72%7.21%26.60%-9.95%3.33%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
18.27%8.86%13.14%2.71%-20.02%-7.55%-0.13%13.83%11.26%16.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TBB and VZ is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.13

The correlation between TBB and VZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TBB:

$3.04

VZ:

$4.10

PE Ratio

TBB:

6.82

VZ:

11.37

PS Ratio

TBB:

1.19

VZ:

1.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

TBB:

$125.65B

VZ:

$139.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TBB:

$105.41B

VZ:

$81.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

TBB:

$54.70B

VZ:

$48.65B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBB vs. VZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBB
TBB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBB vs. VZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBBVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.14

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

1.03

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.11

2.22

-2.11

TBB vs. VZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBB Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the VZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBB and VZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBBVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

0.61

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.10

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.23

+0.05

Drawdowns

TBB vs. VZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBB drawdown since its inception was -16.09%, smaller than the maximum VZ drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBB and VZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBBVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-50.66%

+34.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-13.32%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.94%

-14.93%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.68%

-38.38%

+22.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.90%

-7.84%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-14.75%

+11.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

6.13%

-1.43%

Volatility

TBB vs. VZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is 1.80%, while Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that TBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBBVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

4.69%

-2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.06%

17.48%

-12.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.82%

22.27%

-13.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.12%

21.54%

-10.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.95%

20.31%

-9.36%

Dividends

TBB vs. VZ - Dividend Comparison

TBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than VZ's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
6.44%6.01%5.48%5.70%6.17%5.13%3.63%4.99%6.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
5.93%6.68%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.85%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%

Financials

TBB vs. VZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 and Verizon Communications Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00B35.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
33.47B
34.44B
(TBB) Total Revenue
(VZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TBB and VZ have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VZ has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to TBB (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBB dropped -16.09% vs VZ's -50.66%.

VZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBB and VZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer