TBB vs. NOMD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TBB (AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66) and NOMD (Nomad Foods Limited) are both stocks. Over the past 5 years, TBB returned 0.22%/yr vs -17.08%/yr for NOMD. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TBB vs. NOMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) and Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBB achieves a -5.00% return, which is significantly higher than NOMD's -18.51% return.

TBB

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: -5.00%
• 6M: -5.17%
• 1Y: -2.85%
• 3Y*: 1.13%
• 5Y*: 0.22%
• 10Y*: —

NOMD

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -3.80%
• YTD: -18.51%
• 6M: -18.97%
• 1Y: -38.68%
• 3Y*: -14.32%
• 5Y*: -17.08%
• 10Y*: 2.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBB vs. NOMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TBB AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66	-5.00%	-3.34%	10.14%	14.65%	-12.18%	-0.72%	7.21%	26.60%	-9.95%	3.45%
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited	-18.51%	-22.15%	2.39%	-1.68%	-32.10%	-0.12%	13.63%	33.79%	-1.12%	11.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TBB and NOMD is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.16

The correlation between TBB and NOMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS TBB : $3.04 NOMD : €0.91
PE Ratio TBB : 6.74 NOMD : 9.52
PEG Ratio TBB : 0.28 NOMD : 15.36
PS Ratio TBB : 1.17 NOMD : 0.42
Total Revenue (TTM) TBB : $125.65B NOMD : €3.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) TBB : $105.41B NOMD : €798.02M
EBITDA (TTM) TBB : $54.70B NOMD : €343.69M

Return for Risk

TBB vs. NOMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBB

TBB Risk / Return Rank: 28
TBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
TBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TBB Omega Ratio Rank: 23
TBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
TBB Martin Ratio Rank: 32

NOMD

NOMD Risk / Return Rank: 7
NOMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NOMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NOMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NOMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
NOMD Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBB vs. NOMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) and Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBB	NOMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	-1.24	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.43	-1.85	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	0.77	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	-0.82	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	-1.20	+0.66

TBB vs. NOMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBB Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is higher than the NOMD Sharpe Ratio of -1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBB and NOMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBB vs. NOMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBB drawdown since its inception was -16.09%, smaller than the maximum NOMD drawdown of -67.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBB and NOMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBB	NOMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.09%	-67.99%	+51.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.47%	-47.12%	+35.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.94%	-52.77%	+39.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.68%	-64.82%	+49.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.90%	-65.21%	+54.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.32%	-25.40%	+22.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.23%	32.20%	-26.97%

Volatility

TBB vs. NOMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is 2.04%, while Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that TBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBB	NOMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.04%	6.72%	-4.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.08%	24.55%	-19.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.62%	31.34%	-22.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.13%	29.27%	-18.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.94%	28.61%	-17.67%

Dividends

TBB vs. NOMD - Dividend Comparison

TBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than NOMD's 6.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited	6.88%	5.44%	3.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TBB AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66	6.51%	6.01%	5.48%	5.70%	6.17%	5.13%	3.63%	4.99%	6.07%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBB and NOMD in my portfolio?

TBB and NOMD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBB or NOMD?

NOMD has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to TBB (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBB dropped -16.09% vs NOMD's -67.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.