TBB vs. NOMD
TBB (AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66) and NOMD (Nomad Foods Limited) are both stocks. Over the past 5 years, TBB returned -0.01%/yr vs -12.68%/yr for NOMD. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TBB vs. NOMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBB achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than NOMD's -1.85% return.
TBB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- 6M
- -8.55%
- YTD
- -6.40%
- 1Y
- -8.13%
- 3Y*
- 2.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.68%
NOMD
- 1D
- -4.11%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- -1.85%
- 1Y
- -25.84%
- 3Y*
- -9.31%
- 5Y*
- -12.68%
- 10Y*
- 4.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.32M | $16.84M | $16.30M | |
| $3.11M | $2.95M | $2.68M |
TBB vs. NOMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBB AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 | -6.40% | -3.34% | 10.14% | 14.65% | -12.18% | -0.72% | 7.21% | 26.60% | -9.95% | 3.45% |
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited | -1.85% | -22.15% | 2.39% | -1.68% | -32.10% | -0.12% | 13.63% | 33.79% | -1.12% | 11.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBB and NOMD is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
TBB:
$158.85B
NOMD:
$1.66B
TBB:
$3.03
NOMD:
€0.92
TBB:
6.57
NOMD:
11.21
TBB:
0.27
NOMD:
18.10
TBB:
1.11
NOMD:
0.50
TBB:
1.09
NOMD:
0.59
TBB:
$127.24B
NOMD:
€3.00B
TBB:
$112.60B
NOMD:
€798.02M
TBB:
$49.53B
NOMD:
€343.69M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBB vs. NOMD — Risk / Return Rank
TBB
NOMD
TBB vs. NOMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) and Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBB | NOMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.87 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | -0.58 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | -0.84 | -0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBB vs. NOMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBB drawdown since its inception was -16.09%, smaller than the maximum NOMD drawdown of -67.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBB and NOMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBB | NOMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -67.99% | +51.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -43.85% | +31.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.43% | -52.77% | +40.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.68% | -64.82% | +49.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.21% | -58.09% | +45.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -25.76% | +22.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.39% | 30.24% | -23.85% |
Volatility
TBB vs. NOMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is 2.12%, while Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that TBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBB | NOMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 8.61% | -6.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.93% | 26.11% | -21.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.24% | 32.67% | -24.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.15% | 29.65% | -18.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 28.36% | -17.46% |
Dividends
TBB vs. NOMD - Dividend Comparison
TBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than NOMD's 5.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited | 5.71% | 5.44% | 3.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBB AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 | 6.72% | 6.01% | 5.48% | 5.70% | 6.17% | 5.13% | 3.63% | 4.99% | 6.07% |
Financials
TBB vs. NOMD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 and Nomad Foods Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TBB vs. NOMD - Profitability Comparison
TBB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 reported a gross profit of 25.25B and revenue of 31.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.0%.
NOMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported a gross profit of 186.62M and revenue of 726.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.7%.
TBB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 reported an operating income of 7.04B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.
NOMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported an operating income of 67.70M and revenue of 726.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.
TBB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 reported a net income of 4.59B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
NOMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported a net income of 29.38M and revenue of 726.96M, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TBB and NOMD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOMD has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to TBB (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBB dropped -16.09% vs NOMD's -67.99%.
NOMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.78 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBB and NOMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer