TAUSX vs. JIBCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TAUSX (John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund) and JIBCX (John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - TAUSX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by John Hancock, while JIBCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, TAUSX returned 1.56%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for JIBCX. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. TAUSX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for JIBCX.

Performance

TAUSX vs. JIBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAUSX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than JIBCX's 5.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TAUSX has underperformed JIBCX with an annualized return of 1.56%, while JIBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.43% annualized return.

TAUSX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 6M: 0.12%
• 1Y: 5.49%
• 3Y*: 3.57%
• 5Y*: -0.45%
• 10Y*: 1.56%

JIBCX

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 4.99%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: -3.68%
• 1Y: 10.91%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 15.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAUSX vs. JIBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TAUSX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund	0.20%	7.38%	0.94%	4.76%	-14.69%	-1.49%	9.52%	8.71%	-0.38%	3.88%
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund	5.13%	8.28%	35.89%	49.47%	-38.12%	16.88%	34.25%	29.71%	1.72%	36.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TAUSX and JIBCX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2005	-0.10

The correlation between TAUSX and JIBCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TAUSX vs. JIBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAUSX

TAUSX Risk / Return Rank: 21
TAUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
TAUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
TAUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
TAUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
TAUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

JIBCX

JIBCX Risk / Return Rank: 7
JIBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
JIBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
JIBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
JIBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
JIBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAUSX vs. JIBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TAUSX	JIBCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	0.71	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	1.03	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.14	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	0.53	+1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.10	1.27	+3.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TAUSX vs. JIBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the JIBCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAUSX and JIBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TAUSX	JIBCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	0.71	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	0.41	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	0.68	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.53	+0.50

Drawdowns

TAUSX vs. JIBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAUSX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum JIBCX drawdown of -54.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAUSX and JIBCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAUSX	JIBCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.90%	-54.15%	+34.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.23%	-24.47%	+21.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.29%	-24.47%	+17.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.90%	-42.74%	+22.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.90%	-42.74%	+22.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.40%	-6.71%	+2.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-9.28%	+6.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	9.68%	-8.60%

Volatility

TAUSX vs. JIBCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) is 1.50%, while John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that TAUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAUSX	JIBCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.50%	3.62%	-2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.02%	14.71%	-11.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.09%	18.40%	-14.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.06%	24.50%	-18.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.00%	23.02%	-18.02%

TAUSX vs. JIBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAUSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than JIBCX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

TAUSX vs. JIBCX - Dividend Comparison

TAUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, while JIBCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.97%	3.23%	5.57%	16.46%	4.72%	1.46%	7.73%	16.16%	6.35%	13.20%
TAUSX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund	4.05%	3.99%	3.40%	2.64%	2.50%	2.25%	4.49%	2.83%	2.83%	2.65%	2.66%	2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TAUSX and JIBCX in my portfolio?

TAUSX and JIBCX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TAUSX or JIBCX?

JIBCX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to TAUSX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAUSX dropped -19.90% vs JIBCX's -54.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.