PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBCX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBCX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBCX achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 10.54% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBCX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 15.33%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.67% annualized return.


JIBCX

1D
1.85%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
1.97%
6M
1.67%
1Y
7.62%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
15.33%

FSPSX

1D
0.76%
1M
1.93%
YTD
10.54%
6M
11.05%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBCX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBCX
John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.97%8.28%35.89%49.47%-38.12%16.88%34.25%29.71%1.72%36.25%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
10.54%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBCX and FSPSX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.66

The correlation between JIBCX and FSPSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBCX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBCX
JIBCX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
JIBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBCX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIBCXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.29

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

2.15

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

8.05

-7.24

JIBCX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBCX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIBCX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBCX drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBCX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBCXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.15%

-33.69%

-20.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.47%

-11.39%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.47%

-13.58%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.74%

-29.41%

-13.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.74%

-33.69%

-9.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.51%

0.00%

-9.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-6.53%

-2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.94%

3.04%

+6.90%

Volatility

JIBCX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.93%. This indicates that JIBCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBCXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

4.93%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.44%

12.71%

+2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.34%

15.26%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.63%

16.07%

+8.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

16.56%

+6.52%

JIBCX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBCX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIBCX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

JIBCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.85%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%
JIBCX
John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%6.97%3.23%5.57%16.46%4.72%1.46%7.73%16.16%6.35%13.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIBCX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIBCX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to FSPSX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBCX dropped -54.15% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FSPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBCX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer