PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TAUSX vs. BFFAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TAUSX and BFFAX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

TAUSX vs. BFFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.30%
-1.19%
TAUSX
BFFAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TAUSX:

0.74

BFFAX:

0.77

Sortino Ratio

TAUSX:

1.08

BFFAX:

1.13

Omega Ratio

TAUSX:

1.13

BFFAX:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

TAUSX:

0.29

BFFAX:

0.28

Martin Ratio

TAUSX:

1.88

BFFAX:

1.93

Ulcer Index

TAUSX:

2.20%

BFFAX:

2.13%

Daily Std Dev

TAUSX:

5.56%

BFFAX:

5.29%

Max Drawdown

TAUSX:

-20.13%

BFFAX:

-19.76%

Current Drawdown

TAUSX:

-9.22%

BFFAX:

-9.64%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TAUSX having a 0.78% return and BFFAX slightly lower at 0.75%.


TAUSX

YTD

0.78%

1M

1.01%

6M

-1.29%

1Y

4.36%

5Y*

-0.90%

10Y*

1.20%

BFFAX

YTD

0.75%

1M

0.93%

6M

-1.19%

1Y

4.38%

5Y*

-0.39%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TAUSX vs. BFFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAUSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BFFAX's 0.20% expense ratio.


TAUSX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for TAUSX: current value at 0.74% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.74%
Expense ratio chart for BFFAX: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TAUSX vs. BFFAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAUSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TAUSX is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TAUSX is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TAUSX is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TAUSX is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TAUSX is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TAUSX is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BFFAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BFFAX is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BFFAX is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BFFAX is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BFFAX is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BFFAX is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BFFAX is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TAUSX vs. BFFAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TAUSX, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.740.77
The chart of Sortino ratio for TAUSX, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.081.13
The chart of Omega ratio for TAUSX, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.131.14
The chart of Calmar ratio for TAUSX, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.290.28
The chart of Martin ratio for TAUSX, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001.881.93
TAUSX
BFFAX

The current TAUSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the BFFAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAUSX and BFFAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.74
0.77
TAUSX
BFFAX

Dividends

TAUSX vs. BFFAX - Dividend Comparison

TAUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than BFFAX's 4.67% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TAUSX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund
4.06%4.06%3.59%2.98%2.21%2.25%2.74%2.84%2.66%2.74%2.71%3.26%
BFFAX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3
4.67%4.68%3.95%3.09%1.79%2.21%2.66%2.73%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TAUSX vs. BFFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAUSX drawdown since its inception was -20.13%, roughly equal to the maximum BFFAX drawdown of -19.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAUSX and BFFAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-11.00%-10.00%-9.00%-8.00%-7.00%-6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-9.22%
-9.64%
TAUSX
BFFAX

Volatility

TAUSX vs. BFFAX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX) have volatilities of 1.34% and 1.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.34%
1.38%
TAUSX
BFFAX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab