PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TAUSX vs. BFMCX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TAUSX and BFMCX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

TAUSX vs. BFMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.66%
-1.05%
TAUSX
BFMCX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TAUSX:

0.53

BFMCX:

0.49

Sortino Ratio

TAUSX:

0.78

BFMCX:

0.73

Omega Ratio

TAUSX:

1.09

BFMCX:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

TAUSX:

0.21

BFMCX:

0.16

Martin Ratio

TAUSX:

1.38

BFMCX:

1.21

Ulcer Index

TAUSX:

2.16%

BFMCX:

2.17%

Daily Std Dev

TAUSX:

5.60%

BFMCX:

5.38%

Max Drawdown

TAUSX:

-20.13%

BFMCX:

-22.25%

Current Drawdown

TAUSX:

-9.42%

BFMCX:

-12.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAUSX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than BFMCX's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, TAUSX has outperformed BFMCX with an annualized return of 1.14%, while BFMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.84% annualized return.


TAUSX

YTD

0.56%

1M

1.12%

6M

-0.44%

1Y

3.44%

5Y*

-0.84%

10Y*

1.14%

BFMCX

YTD

0.49%

1M

0.99%

6M

-0.93%

1Y

2.88%

5Y*

-1.44%

10Y*

0.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TAUSX vs. BFMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAUSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BFMCX's 0.44% expense ratio.


TAUSX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for TAUSX: current value at 0.74% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.74%
Expense ratio chart for BFMCX: current value at 0.44% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.44%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TAUSX vs. BFMCX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAUSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TAUSX is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TAUSX is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TAUSX is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TAUSX is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TAUSX is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TAUSX is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BFMCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BFMCX is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BFMCX is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BFMCX is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BFMCX is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BFMCX is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BFMCX is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TAUSX vs. BFMCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TAUSX, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.570.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for TAUSX, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.840.73
The chart of Omega ratio for TAUSX, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.101.09
The chart of Calmar ratio for TAUSX, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.220.16
The chart of Martin ratio for TAUSX, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001.491.21
TAUSX
BFMCX

The current TAUSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the BFMCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAUSX and BFMCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.57
0.49
TAUSX
BFMCX

Dividends

TAUSX vs. BFMCX - Dividend Comparison

TAUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than BFMCX's 3.84% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TAUSX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund
3.73%4.06%3.59%2.98%2.21%2.25%2.74%2.84%2.66%2.74%2.71%3.26%
BFMCX
BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio
3.84%4.21%3.64%2.47%1.61%1.99%2.85%2.84%2.69%2.43%2.42%2.98%

Drawdowns

TAUSX vs. BFMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAUSX drawdown since its inception was -20.13%, smaller than the maximum BFMCX drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAUSX and BFMCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-9.42%
-12.32%
TAUSX
BFMCX

Volatility

TAUSX vs. BFMCX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) have volatilities of 1.49% and 1.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.49%
1.53%
TAUSX
BFMCX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab