PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAUSX vs. JFIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAUSX vs. JFIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAUSX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than JFIVX's 11.42% return.


TAUSX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.22%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
-0.51%
10Y*
1.55%

JFIVX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.22%
YTD
11.42%
6M
11.77%
1Y
29.22%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
13.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAUSX vs. JFIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAUSX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.09%7.38%0.94%4.76%-14.69%-1.49%9.52%8.71%-0.38%3.54%
JFIVX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust
11.42%17.54%24.61%25.92%-18.30%28.31%18.03%31.05%-5.00%17.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TAUSX and JFIVX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.01

Over the past year, TAUSX and JFIVX have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAUSX vs. JFIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAUSX
TAUSX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TAUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TAUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

JFIVX
JFIVX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JFIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JFIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAUSX vs. JFIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) and John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAUSXJFIVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

2.54

-1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

3.45

-1.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.46

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

3.60

-1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.33

16.97

-11.64

TAUSX vs. JFIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the JFIVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAUSX and JFIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAUSXJFIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.54

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.84

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.83

+0.19

Drawdowns

TAUSX vs. JFIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAUSX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum JFIVX drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAUSX and JFIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAUSXJFIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

-33.81%

+13.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.23%

-8.94%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.29%

-18.82%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.90%

-24.67%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.51%

0.00%

-4.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-4.63%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.90%

-0.83%

Volatility

TAUSX vs. JFIVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) is 1.50%, while John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that TAUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JFIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAUSXJFIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

2.83%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

9.01%

-5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

11.97%

-7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

16.55%

-10.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

18.34%

-13.34%

TAUSX vs. JFIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAUSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than JFIVX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAUSX vs. JFIVX - Dividend Comparison

TAUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than JFIVX's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JFIVX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust
2.29%2.56%2.19%2.44%5.19%5.17%3.38%2.97%2.90%1.27%0.00%0.00%
TAUSX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund
4.05%3.99%3.40%2.64%2.50%2.25%4.49%2.83%2.83%2.65%2.66%2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAUSX and JFIVX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JFIVX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to TAUSX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAUSX dropped -19.90% vs JFIVX's -33.81%.

JFIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAUSX and JFIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer