PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBCX vs. AGTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBCX vs. AGTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBCX achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly lower than AGTHX's 10.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JIBCX having a 15.52% annualized return and AGTHX not far ahead at 16.01%.


JIBCX

1D
0.48%
1M
5.50%
YTD
5.99%
6M
-3.11%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
15.52%

AGTHX

1D
0.37%
1M
7.36%
YTD
10.45%
6M
10.73%
1Y
27.14%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
16.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBCX vs. AGTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBCX
John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund
5.99%8.28%35.89%49.47%-38.12%16.88%34.25%29.71%1.72%36.25%
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
10.45%19.73%28.02%37.22%-30.75%19.32%37.83%28.16%-3.15%26.14%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBCX and AGTHX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2005

0.93

The correlation between JIBCX and AGTHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBCX vs. AGTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBCX
JIBCX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
JIBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

AGTHX
AGTHX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AGTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AGTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBCX vs. AGTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIBCXAGTHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.86

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

2.53

-1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.33

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

2.04

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.98

7.98

-5.00

JIBCX vs. AGTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the AGTHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBCX and AGTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIBCXAGTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.86

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.61

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.82

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.71

-0.18

Drawdowns

JIBCX vs. AGTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBCX drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, roughly equal to the maximum AGTHX drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBCX and AGTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBCXAGTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.15%

-51.91%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.47%

-13.76%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.47%

-21.57%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.74%

-36.38%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.74%

-36.38%

-6.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.95%

0.00%

-5.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-9.20%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.68%

3.52%

+6.16%

Volatility

JIBCX vs. AGTHX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBCXAGTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.61%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

11.66%

+3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

15.18%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.50%

20.25%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

19.69%

+3.33%

JIBCX vs. AGTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBCX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than AGTHX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIBCX vs. AGTHX - Dividend Comparison

JIBCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
9.68%10.69%8.99%7.40%4.05%8.18%4.30%7.15%11.99%7.03%6.61%8.87%
JIBCX
John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%6.97%3.23%5.57%16.46%4.72%1.46%7.73%16.16%6.35%13.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIBCX and AGTHX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGTHX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to JIBCX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBCX dropped -54.15% vs AGTHX's -51.91%.

AGTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBCX and AGTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer