JIBCX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
JIBCX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 14, 2005. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
JIBCX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JIBCX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund | -11.51% | 8.28% | 35.89% | 49.47% | -38.12% | 16.88% | 34.25% | 29.71% | 1.72% | 36.25% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JIBCX achieves a -11.51% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -3.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JIBCX having a 13.64% annualized return and VOO not far ahead at 14.14%.
JIBCX
- 1D
- 3.96%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- -11.51%
- 6M
- -18.02%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JIBCX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JIBCX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JIBCX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
JIBCX
VOO
JIBCX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JIBCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 1.01 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 1.53 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.23 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 1.55 | -1.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 7.31 | -8.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JIBCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 1.01 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.71 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.79 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.83 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between JIBCX and VOO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JIBCX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
JIBCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.97% | 3.23% | 5.57% | 16.46% | 4.72% | 1.46% | 7.73% | 16.16% | 6.35% | 13.20% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
JIBCX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JIBCX drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBCX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JIBCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.15% | -33.99% | -20.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.47% | -11.98% | -12.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.74% | -24.52% | -18.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.74% | -33.99% | -8.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.48% | -5.55% | -15.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -3.72% | -5.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.51% | 2.55% | +7.96% |
Volatility
JIBCX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that JIBCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JIBCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 5.34% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 9.47% | +5.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.49% | 18.11% | +8.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 16.82% | +7.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 17.99% | +4.99% |