TATT vs. PAYS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tat Techno (TATT) and PaySign, Inc. (PAYS).

Performance

TATT vs. PAYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tat Techno (TATT) and PaySign, Inc. (PAYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TATT vs. PAYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TATT Tat Techno	-9.02%	73.91%	153.00%	91.51%	-16.00%	39.28%	-10.30%	-17.89%	-41.43%	23.44%
PAYS PaySign, Inc.	14.56%	70.53%	7.86%	8.53%	61.25%	-65.52%	-54.29%	188.35%	382.19%	118.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TATT : $531.98M PAYS : $363.58M
EPS TATT : $1.33 PAYS : $0.12
PE Ratio TATT : 30.46 PAYS : 47.21
PEG Ratio TATT : 0.22 PAYS : 0.40
PS Ratio TATT : 2.88 PAYS : 4.35
PB Ratio TATT : 3.02 PAYS : 7.50
Total Revenue (TTM) TATT : $178.02M PAYS : $82.03M
Gross Profit (TTM) TATT : $44.10M PAYS : $48.72M
EBITDA (TTM) TATT : $23.59M PAYS : $16.91M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TATT achieves a -9.02% return, which is significantly lower than PAYS's 14.56% return. Over the past 10 years, TATT has underperformed PAYS with an annualized return of 19.53%, while PAYS has yielded a comparatively higher 41.00% annualized return.

TATT

• 1D: 6.86%
• 1M: -26.62%
• YTD: -9.02%
• 6M: -7.72%
• 1Y: 47.85%
• 3Y*: 87.44%
• 5Y*: 51.27%
• 10Y*: 19.53%

PAYS

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: 66.20%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 6M: -6.20%
• 1Y: 178.30%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 5.15%
• 10Y*: 41.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TATT vs. PAYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TATT

TATT Risk / Return Rank: 67
TATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
TATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
TATT Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TATT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PAYS

PAYS Risk / Return Rank: 88
PAYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PAYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PAYS Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PAYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
PAYS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TATT vs. PAYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tat Techno (TATT) and PaySign, Inc. (PAYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TATT	PAYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	2.33	-1.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	3.04	-1.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.40	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	2.82	-1.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.69	5.00	-1.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TATT vs. PAYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TATT Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the PAYS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TATT and PAYS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TATT	PAYS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	2.33	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	0.08	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.50	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.04	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between TATT and PAYS is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TATT vs. PAYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither TATT nor PAYS has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
TATT Tat Techno	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.24%	3.88%
PAYS PaySign, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TATT vs. PAYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TATT drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, roughly equal to the maximum PAYS drawdown of -98.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATT and PAYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TATT	PAYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.07%	-98.95%	+1.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.78%	-62.85%	+25.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.93%	-72.98%	+34.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.11%	-93.09%	+17.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.51%	-67.13%	+33.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.21%	-69.45%	+3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.93%	35.39%	-23.46%

Volatility

TATT vs. PAYS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tat Techno (TATT) is 28.89%, while PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) has a volatility of 35.04%. This indicates that TATT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TATT	PAYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.89%	35.04%	-6.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.65%	47.66%	-4.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.91%	76.96%	-14.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.45%	67.43%	-15.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.60%	81.60%	-33.00%

Financials

TATT vs. PAYS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tat Techno and PaySign, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TATT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tat Techno reported a gross profit of 11.72M and revenue of 46.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

PAYS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.12M and revenue of 22.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.

TATT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tat Techno reported an operating income of 4.54M and revenue of 46.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

PAYS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.85M and revenue of 22.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

TATT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tat Techno reported a net income of 4.73M and revenue of 46.53M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.

PAYS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 22.76M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.