TARK vs. QBTX
TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from AXS. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TARK returned -18.26% vs -67.82% for QBTX. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TARK charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QBTX.
Performance
TARK vs. QBTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -24.46% return, which is significantly higher than QBTX's -76.90% return.
TARK
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -24.19%
- 6M
- -18.59%
- YTD
- -24.46%
- 1Y
- -18.26%
- 3Y*
- 1.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.86%
QBTX
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -42.34%
- 6M
- -62.38%
- YTD
- -76.90%
- 1Y
- -67.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.57M | $16.05M | $40.46M | |
| $604.81K | $641.97K | $710.94K |
TARK vs. QBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | -24.46% | 106.81% |
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | -76.90% | 339.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TARK and QBTX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025 | 0.61 |
The correlation between TARK and QBTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TARK vs. QBTX — Risk / Return Rank
TARK
QBTX
TARK vs. QBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TARK | QBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.08 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | -0.74 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -0.95 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TARK vs. QBTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, smaller than the maximum QBTX drawdown of -95.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and QBTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TARK | QBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -95.48% | +17.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.57% | -95.48% | +37.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.30% | -94.67% | +44.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.55% | -60.34% | +9.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.47% | 74.79% | -41.32% |
Volatility
TARK vs. QBTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) is 20.33%, while Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a volatility of 57.40%. This indicates that TARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TARK | QBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.33% | 57.40% | -37.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.18% | 149.53% | -94.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.66% | 219.66% | -147.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.17% | 237.92% | -147.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.17% | 237.92% | -147.75% |
TARK vs. QBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QBTX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TARK vs. QBTX - Dividend Comparison
TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.71%, less than QBTX's 57.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | 57.13% | 13.20% | 0.00% |
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | 39.71% | 30.00% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TARK and QBTX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTX has higher volatility (57.40%) compared to TARK (20.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs QBTX's -95.48%.
On 1-year performance, TARK leads with -18.26% vs -67.82% for QBTX. On fees, TARK is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, TARK has been the lower-risk option at 20.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TARK has performed better with a -18.26% return vs -67.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TARK is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QBTX.
QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 57.13%, compared with 39.71% for TARK.
Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 1.30% for QBTX.
QBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TARK and QBTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer