PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TARK vs. QBTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TARK vs. QBTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -24.46% return, which is significantly higher than QBTX's -76.90% return.


TARK

1D
-4.73%
1M
-24.19%
6M
-18.59%
YTD
-24.46%
1Y
-18.26%
3Y*
1.19%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-9.86%

QBTX

1D
1.33%
1M
-42.34%
6M
-62.38%
YTD
-76.90%
1Y
-67.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$17.57M$16.05M$40.46M
$604.81K$641.97K$710.94K

TARK vs. QBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-24.46%106.81%
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
-76.90%339.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and QBTX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.61

The correlation between TARK and QBTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TARK vs. QBTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

QBTX
QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TARK vs. QBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TARKQBTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.08

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

-0.74

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

-0.95

+0.11

TARK vs. QBTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is comparable to the QBTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARK and QBTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TARK vs. QBTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, smaller than the maximum QBTX drawdown of -95.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and QBTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TARKQBTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-95.48%

+17.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.57%

-95.48%

+37.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.30%

-94.67%

+44.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.55%

-60.34%

+9.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.47%

74.79%

-41.32%

Volatility

TARK vs. QBTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) is 20.33%, while Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a volatility of 57.40%. This indicates that TARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TARKQBTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.33%

57.40%

-37.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.18%

149.53%

-94.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.66%

219.66%

-147.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.17%

237.92%

-147.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.17%

237.92%

-147.75%

TARK vs. QBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QBTX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TARK vs. QBTX - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.71%, less than QBTX's 57.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
57.13%13.20%0.00%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
39.71%30.00%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


TARK and QBTX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBTX has higher volatility (57.40%) compared to TARK (20.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs QBTX's -95.48%.

On 1-year performance, TARK leads with -18.26% vs -67.82% for QBTX. On fees, TARK is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, TARK has been the lower-risk option at 20.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TARK has performed better with a -18.26% return vs -67.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TARK is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QBTX.

QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 57.13%, compared with 39.71% for TARK.

Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 1.30% for QBTX.

QBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TARK and QBTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer