QBTX vs. MUU
QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QBTX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
QBTX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QBTX
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -37.54%
- YTD
- -51.87%
- 6M
- -69.24%
- 1Y
- -33.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- 14.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | -14.87% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTX and MUU is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTX vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
QBTX
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QBTX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -14.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.48% | -14.14% | -81.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.89% | 0.00% | -88.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.21% | -6.17% | -51.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 69.03% | — | — |
Volatility
QBTX vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 84.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 150.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 217.88% | 222.50% | -4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 241.46% | 222.50% | +18.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 241.46% | 222.50% | +18.96% |
QBTX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBTX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.42%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | 27.42% | 13.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, QBTX and MUU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QBTX.
QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 27.42%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QBTX and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for QBTX and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer