PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBTX vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBTX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QBTX

1D
-1.49%
1M
-37.54%
YTD
-51.87%
6M
-69.24%
1Y
-33.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
14.03%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBTX and MUU is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBTX vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTX
QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBTXMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.49

QBTX vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBTX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -14.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBTXMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.48%

-14.14%

-81.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-95.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.89%

0.00%

-88.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.21%

-6.17%

-51.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

69.03%

Volatility

QBTX vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBTXMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

84.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

150.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

217.88%

222.50%

-4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

241.46%

222.50%

+18.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

241.46%

222.50%

+18.96%

QBTX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBTX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.42%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.00%0.00%
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
27.42%13.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, QBTX and MUU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QBTX.

QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 27.42%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QBTX and 1.01% for MUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBTX and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer