PortfoliosLab logo
TARK vs. QCLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and QCLN is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

TARK vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TARK:

-0.34

QCLN:

-0.54

Sortino Ratio

TARK:

0.11

QCLN:

-0.59

Omega Ratio

TARK:

1.02

QCLN:

0.93

Calmar Ratio

TARK:

-0.43

QCLN:

-0.27

Martin Ratio

TARK:

-0.90

QCLN:

-1.18

Ulcer Index

TARK:

42.20%

QCLN:

16.57%

Daily Std Dev

TARK:

101.33%

QCLN:

36.48%

Max Drawdown

TARK:

-88.03%

QCLN:

-76.18%

Current Drawdown

TARK:

-78.32%

QCLN:

-65.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -15.41% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's -10.90% return.


TARK

YTD

-15.41%

1M

21.18%

6M

-20.30%

1Y

-33.29%

3Y*

-30.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QCLN

YTD

-10.90%

1M

8.32%

6M

-14.92%

1Y

-19.31%

3Y*

-17.97%

5Y*

2.82%

10Y*

5.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TARK vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TARK vs. QCLN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TARK is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TARK is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TARK is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TARK is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TARK is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TARK is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QCLN is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QCLN is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QCLN is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QCLN is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QCLN is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QCLN is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TARK vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is higher than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARK and QCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TARK vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than QCLN's 1.04% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
0.70%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
1.04%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.25%0.72%0.78%

Drawdowns

TARK vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -88.03%, which is greater than QCLN's maximum drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and QCLN.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TARK vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 24.29% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) at 10.10%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...