PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TARK vs. QCLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


TARKQCLN
YTD Return-33.20%-16.65%
1Y Return-0.60%-21.69%
Sharpe Ratio-0.04-0.59
Daily Std Dev72.47%37.25%
Max Drawdown-77.82%-76.18%
Current Drawdown-64.01%-59.74%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between TARK and QCLN is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

TARK vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -33.20% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's -16.65% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-24.42%
3.96%
TARK
QCLN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TARK vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
Expense ratio chart for TARK: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for QCLN: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TARK vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TARK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TARK, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TARK, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.46
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TARK, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TARK, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TARK, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.10
QCLN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QCLN, currently valued at -0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QCLN, currently valued at -0.69, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.69
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QCLN, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.93
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QCLN, currently valued at -0.40, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QCLN, currently valued at -1.06, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-1.06

TARK vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of TARK and QCLN.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.04
-0.59
TARK
QCLN

Dividends

TARK vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

TARK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.82%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%0.79%0.41%

Drawdowns

TARK vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, roughly equal to the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and QCLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-64.01%
-48.16%
TARK
QCLN

Volatility

TARK vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 21.16% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) at 11.26%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
21.16%
11.26%
TARK
QCLN