QBTX vs. QBTZ
QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) and QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBTX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by Tradr, while QBTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance ETFs. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. QBTX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for QBTZ.
Performance
QBTX vs. QBTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTX achieves a -34.37% return, which is significantly higher than QBTZ's -86.63% return.
QBTX
- 1D
- -16.05%
- 1M
- 46.29%
- YTD
- -34.37%
- 6M
- -37.13%
- 1Y
- -32.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTZ
- 1D
- 16.41%
- 1M
- -74.19%
- YTD
- -86.63%
- 6M
- -91.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTX vs. QBTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | -34.37% | -65.57% |
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | -86.63% | -50.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTX and QBTZ is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTX vs. QBTZ — Risk / Return Rank
QBTX
QBTZ
QBTX vs. QBTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QBTX | QBTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBTX | QBTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | -0.42 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
QBTX vs. QBTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, roughly equal to the maximum QBTZ drawdown of -96.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and QBTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTX | QBTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.48% | -96.03% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.84% | -95.35% | +10.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.06% | -55.63% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.01% | — | — |
Volatility
QBTX vs. QBTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTX | QBTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 77.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 149.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 214.79% | 235.15% | -20.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 241.97% | 235.15% | +6.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 241.97% | 235.15% | +6.82% |
QBTX vs. QBTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QBTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBTX vs. QBTZ - Dividend Comparison
QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.11%, while QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | 20.11% | 13.20% |
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTX and QBTZ have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QBTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QBTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QBTX.
QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 20.11%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.
QBTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QBTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Defiance ETFs. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QBTX and 1.29% for QBTZ.
Find the right allocation for QBTX and QBTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer