PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TARK vs. ZROZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TARK vs. ZROZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -6.61% return, which is significantly lower than ZROZ's 1.19% return.


TARK

1D
-4.65%
1M
3.40%
YTD
-6.61%
6M
-16.92%
1Y
9.49%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
10Y*

ZROZ

1D
0.22%
1M
4.56%
YTD
1.19%
6M
0.40%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
-7.49%
5Y*
-11.95%
10Y*
-4.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARK vs. ZROZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-6.61%41.00%-4.85%121.37%-71.31%
ZROZ
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund
1.19%-1.84%-16.18%1.19%-22.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and ZROZ is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2022

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TARK vs. ZROZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

ZROZ
ZROZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ZROZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZROZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZROZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ZROZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZROZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARK vs. ZROZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TARKZROZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.04

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

0.23

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.31

0.50

-0.19

TARK vs. ZROZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the ZROZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARK and ZROZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TARK vs. ZROZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than ZROZ's maximum drawdown of -62.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and ZROZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TARKZROZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-62.93%

-14.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.57%

-14.02%

-43.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.55%

-28.62%

-36.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.55%

-59.02%

+20.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.81%

-24.15%

-26.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.60%

6.40%

+24.20%

Volatility

TARK vs. ZROZ - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 24.60% compared to PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) at 3.56%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZROZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TARKZROZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.60%

3.56%

+21.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.08%

10.75%

+42.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.42%

15.73%

+55.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.69%

23.83%

+66.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.69%

22.03%

+68.66%

TARK vs. ZROZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ZROZ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TARK vs. ZROZ - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.12%, more than ZROZ's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
32.12%30.00%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZROZ
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund
5.03%4.96%4.58%3.52%2.76%1.60%1.68%2.22%2.06%2.53%3.00%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


TARK and ZROZ have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TARK has higher volatility (24.60%) compared to ZROZ (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs ZROZ's -62.93%.

On 3-year performance, TARK leads with 19.69% vs -7.49% for ZROZ. On fees, ZROZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZROZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TARK has performed better with a 19.69% return vs -7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZROZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 32.12%, compared with 5.03% for ZROZ.

TARK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ZROZ is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: AXS and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.15% for ZROZ.

ZROZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TARK and ZROZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer