TARK vs. ZROZ
TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and ZROZ (PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TARK is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while ZROZ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Long U.S. Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. TARK is actively managed, while ZROZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TARK returned 8.87%/yr vs -7.96%/yr for ZROZ. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TARK charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZROZ.
Performance
TARK vs. ZROZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -8.01% return, which is significantly lower than ZROZ's -3.01% return.
TARK
- 1D
- -5.15%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- 6M
- -19.36%
- YTD
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- -4.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZROZ
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 0.40%
- 3Y*
- -7.96%
- 5Y*
- -13.29%
- 10Y*
- -4.99%
TARK vs. ZROZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | -8.01% | 41.00% | -4.85% | 121.37% | -71.31% |
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | -3.01% | -1.84% | -16.18% | 1.19% | -22.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between TARK and ZROZ is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2022 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TARK vs. ZROZ — Risk / Return Rank
TARK
ZROZ
TARK vs. ZROZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TARK | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.02 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 0.03 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 0.06 | -0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TARK vs. ZROZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than ZROZ's maximum drawdown of -62.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and ZROZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TARK | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -62.93% | -14.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.57% | -14.02% | -43.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.55% | -28.21% | -37.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.47% | -60.72% | +21.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.62% | -24.26% | -26.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.80% | 6.58% | +25.22% |
Volatility
TARK vs. ZROZ - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 19.55% compared to PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) at 4.76%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZROZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TARK | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.55% | 4.76% | +14.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.71% | 11.09% | +42.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.83% | 15.54% | +56.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.35% | 23.81% | +66.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.35% | 21.96% | +68.39% |
TARK vs. ZROZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ZROZ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TARK vs. ZROZ - Dividend Comparison
TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.61%, more than ZROZ's 5.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | 32.61% | 30.00% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | 5.35% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.76% | 1.60% | 1.68% | 2.22% | 2.06% | 2.53% | 3.00% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TARK and ZROZ have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TARK has higher volatility (19.55%) compared to ZROZ (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs ZROZ's -62.93%.
On 3-year performance, TARK leads with 8.87% vs -7.96% for ZROZ. On fees, ZROZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZROZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TARK has performed better with a 8.87% return vs -7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZROZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.
TARK has the higher dividend yield at 32.61%, compared with 5.35% for ZROZ.
TARK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ZROZ is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: AXS and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.15% for ZROZ.
ZROZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TARK and ZROZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer