QBTX vs. QQQP
QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) and QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Over the past year, QBTX returned -72.96% vs 42.73% for QQQP. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
QBTX vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTX achieves a -78.05% return, which is significantly lower than QQQP's 21.65% return.
QBTX
- 1D
- -14.89%
- 1M
- -53.04%
- 6M
- -81.47%
- YTD
- -78.05%
- 1Y
- -72.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQP
- 1D
- -3.42%
- 1M
- -7.32%
- 6M
- 19.26%
- YTD
- 21.65%
- 1Y
- 42.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTX vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | -78.05% | 339.28% |
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF | 21.65% | 60.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTX and QQQP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTX vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank
QBTX
QQQP
QBTX vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTX | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.21 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 1.69 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 5.87 | -6.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTX vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and QQQP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTX | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.48% | -42.50% | -52.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.48% | -25.35% | -70.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.93% | -10.77% | -84.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.11% | -7.26% | -51.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.94% | 7.30% | +65.64% |
Volatility
QBTX vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a higher volatility of 44.01% compared to Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) at 13.29%. This indicates that QBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTX | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.01% | 13.29% | +30.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 145.15% | 29.22% | +115.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 218.35% | 35.84% | +182.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 237.52% | 44.34% | +193.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 237.52% | 44.34% | +193.18% |
QBTX vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QBTX and QQQP have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
QBTX vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison
QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.12%, while QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | 60.12% | 13.20% |
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTX and QQQP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTX has higher volatility (44.01%) compared to QQQP (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTX dropped -95.48% vs QQQP's -42.50%.
On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 42.73% vs -72.96% for QBTX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQP has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 42.73% return vs -72.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QBTX and QQQP have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 60.12%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.
QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBTX and QQQP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer