PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBTX vs. QQQP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBTX vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTX achieves a -49.88% return, which is significantly lower than QQQP's 26.65% return.


QBTX

1D
4.15%
1M
-34.95%
YTD
-49.88%
6M
-60.48%
1Y
-24.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQP

1D
-5.26%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
26.65%
6M
23.33%
1Y
61.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTX vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
-49.88%339.28%
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
26.65%60.80%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTX and QQQP is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBTX vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTX
QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTX vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBTXQQQPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

2.43

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

8.72

-9.08

QBTX vs. QQQP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the QQQP Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTX and QQQP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBTX vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and QQQP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBTXQQQPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.48%

-42.50%

-52.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-95.48%

-25.35%

-70.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.42%

-7.10%

-81.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.31%

-7.26%

-50.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

69.22%

7.05%

+62.17%

Volatility

QBTX vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a higher volatility of 66.40% compared to Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) at 15.55%. This indicates that QBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBTXQQQPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

66.40%

15.55%

+50.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

150.11%

27.56%

+122.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

217.47%

34.61%

+182.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

241.06%

44.42%

+196.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

241.06%

44.42%

+196.64%

QBTX vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QBTX and QQQP have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

QBTX vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison

QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.33%, while QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
26.33%13.20%
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBTX and QQQP have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBTX has higher volatility (66.40%) compared to QQQP (15.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTX dropped -95.48% vs QQQP's -42.50%.

On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 61.35% vs -24.24% for QBTX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQP has been the lower-risk option at 15.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 61.35% return vs -24.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QBTX and QQQP have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 26.33%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.

QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBTX and QQQP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer